Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

GARP vs VT: how they differ

GARP and VT hold 27% of their weight in the same names, and GARP returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF and Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, GARP and VT hold 27% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions GARP and VT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingGARPVT
NVIDIA CORP4.16%4.22%
APPLE INC4.44%3.53%
MICROSOFT CORP4.10%2.73%
ALPHABET INC2.88%2.04%
BROADCOM INC3.96%1.74%
AMAZON.COM INC1.49%2.29%
META PLATFORMS INC3.35%1.21%
ALPHABET INC0.91%1.61%
ELI LILLY & COMPANY3.73%0.68%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC6.07%0.52%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC2.21%0.52%
VISA INC3.73%0.50%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in GARPOnly in VT
ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD 1.46%Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 1.52%
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PLC 0.49%Tesla Inc 0.97%
FLUTTER ENTERTAINMENT PLC 0.26%JPMorgan Chase & Co 0.72%
FABRINET 0.14%Berkshire Hathaway Inc 0.69%
EVEREST GROUP LTD 0.11%Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 0.64%
CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING LTD 0.11%Exxon Mobil Corp 0.59%
TECHNIPFMC PLC 0.10%Walmart Inc 0.52%
CARNIVAL CORP LTD 0.10%ASML Holding NV 0.51%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

GARP and VT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isMSCI USA Quality GARPTotal World Stock
Total return, 1 year+29.5%+18.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+12.0 pts+1.4 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.06%
Already in the S&P 50094.4%55.2%
Holdings13110042

GARP in plain words

GARP is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality GARP. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +29.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 131 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.

VT in plain words

VT is an index equity fund tracking the Total World Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 55% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10042 positions, with the top ten at 21.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GARP or VT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GARP returned +29.5% and VT returned +18.9%, so GARP returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, GARP or VT?
GARP charges 0.15% a year and VT charges 0.06%, so VT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do GARP and VT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 94% of GARP and 55% of VT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 27% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GARP against VT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GARP against VT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/GARP-VT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources