A look inside thematic ETF portfolios shows how much of what they hold is already available through a plain S&P 500 fund. Across 391 funds with usable holdings data, the typical, or median, thematic ETF has 32% of its weight in stocks the S&P 500 already holds. That leaves a median active share of roughly two-thirds of the portfolio made up of names outside the index, though the split varies widely by theme. Seventy-four of the 391 funds hold more than sixty percent of their weight in index names.
The theme-by-theme numbers show where that overlap concentrates. Energy security and critical technology funds carry a median 85% of their weight in S&P 500 constituents, the highest of any theme listed, alongside a median active share of 95%. AI infrastructure and chips (64%) and semiconductors (63%) also sit high on the in-index measure, while funds built around gold miners (5%), cannabis (0%), coal (0%) and silver miners (2%) hold almost none of their weight in S&P 500 names, pushing active share for those groups to 100%.
Fees sit at a median 0.60% across the 419 funds and 54 themes in the full table. When the fee is measured only against the part of each portfolio that differs from the S&P 500, the median fee for that difference is also 0.60%, meaning that, overall, paying for a thematic ETF is roughly the same, fee-for-fee, as paying for its non-index portion. Within individual themes the two numbers sometimes diverge. Semiconductors, for example, shows a median fee of 0.30% but a median fee for the difference of 0.40%, and artificial intelligence moves from 0.70% to 0.80% on the same measure, reflecting how much of each portfolio's cost is tied to holdings that overlap with the index.
One-year returns and index overlap do not move in a single direction across the theme table. Semiconductors funds beat the S&P 500 in 9 of 9 cases with a median one-year return of +84.4%, despite a 63% in-index median weight. Defense funds, by contrast, beat the index in 0 of 14 cases with a median return of −6.8%, despite a lower in-index weight of 40%. Gold miners, with only 5% of weight in index names, beat the S&P 500 in 6 of 9 cases and returned +22.8%.
A separate check on portfolio overlap between funds, rather than against the index, finds 131 pairs across the dataset holding more than half the same names by weight. The listed pairs include PDBA and EVMT in agriculture, fully identical in weight overlap at 100%, and IBBQ and IBB in biotech, overlapping 85% with fees of 0.19% and 0.44% respectively. Semiconductor pairs such as SOXQ and SOXX (82%) and SHOC and SMH (78%) also appear, each with differing fee levels attached to similar underlying holdings.
Readers can check any fund's current in-index weight, active share and fee numbers, along with its latest one-year return, against the live desk.