A thematic ETF is built to look different from the broad market, but the holdings filings show that difference is often smaller than the label implies. Across 379 funds with usable data, the typical thematic ETF has 29% of its weight in stocks the S&P 500 already holds. That median masks a wide range: 74 of the 379 funds carry more than sixty percent of their weight in index names, meaning a majority of the portfolio overlaps with a benchmark most investors already own through a core holding.
The overlap varies sharply by theme. Gold miners, silver miners, copper, nuclear and uranium, clean energy, space, rare earth and critical materials, and lithium and battery metals all show single-digit to teens median in-index weight, with active share at or near 100%. These themes sit far from the S&P 500's usual composition. At the other end, energy security and critical technology shows 86% in the S&P 500, and semiconductors, AI infrastructure and chips, and digital infrastructure and data centers each show more than 60%, with active share in the 80s to high 80s. Artificial intelligence, at 36 funds, sits at 56% in-index weight with 80% active share.
Fees do not track this difference in a consistent way. Across 54 themes and 405 funds, the median fee is 0.60%, and the median fee for just the portion of each fund that differs from the S&P 500 is also 0.60%. Some themes show a fee premium once the index-overlapping part is set aside: broad innovation and megatrends moves from 0.50% to 0.60%, artificial intelligence from 0.70% to 0.80%, and electrification and the grid from 0.50% to 0.60%. Others, including semiconductors, gold miners, and cybersecurity, show no change between the two measures.
One-year total returns and index-beating records also sit alongside these overlap numbers without a fixed relationship. Semiconductors, at 66% in-index weight, beat the S&P 500 in 9 of 9 funds with a median total return of +101.2%. Gold miners, at 5% in-index weight, also beat in 9 of 9 funds, returning +37.4%. Defense, at 39% in-index weight and 98% active share, beat in 0 of 14 funds, returning +1.9%.
Separately, the holdings data show that owning more than one thematic fund does not always mean owning two different things. Among the funds compared, 139 pairs hold portfolios more than half identical by weight. The closest matches include EVMT and PDBA in electric vehicles and batteries at 97% weight overlap, SOXQ and SOXX in semiconductors at 86%, and AUAU and GDX in gold miners at 84%. In these cases the two funds carry different fees despite near-duplicate holdings, for example 0.19% versus 0.33% for SOXQ and SOXX.
Readers can check any fund's current in-index weight, active share, fee, and overlap with named peers on the live desk before comparing a thematic ETF to a core index holding.