SPMO vs USCA: Differences, Returns & Fees
SPMO and USCA hold 32% of their weight in the same names, and SPMO returned +25.1% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $23.3bn for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF and $3.6bn for Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF.
USCA costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 12.2 points; SPMO is 6.5 times larger.
| SPMO | USCA | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.13% | 0.07% |
| Net assets | $23.3bn | $3.6bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +25.1% | +12.9% |
| What it tracks | S&P 500 Momentum Index | MSCI USA Climate Action Index |
| Holdings in common | 32% | |
| Holdings dated | Oct 10, 2026 | May 29, 2026 |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 50.9% | 45.9% |
| Below its high | 6.3%, high on Jun 22, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, SPMO and USCA hold 32% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
half
32% in common
On the same fields
SPMO and USCA on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About SPMO
SPMO tracks the S&P 500 Momentum. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +25.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.13% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 101 positions, with the top ten at 50.9%. It sat 6.3% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
About USCA
USCA tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +12.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 29, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 404 positions, with the top ten at 45.9%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, SPMO or USCA?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPMO returned +25.1% and USCA +12.9%.
- Which is cheaper, SPMO or USCA?
- USCA is cheaper, by 0.06 percentage points a year. That is about $6 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, SPMO against USCA, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/spmo-vs-usca
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). SPMO against USCA. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/spmo-vs-usca
[SPMO against USCA (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/spmo-vs-usca)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.