MTUM vs QLTY: Differences, Returns & Fees
MTUM and QLTY hold 15% of their weight in the same names, and MTUM returned +25.8% over the year. Net assets: $20.3bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF, and $4.5bn on May 31, 2026 for GMO U.S. Quality ETF.
MTUM costs 0.35 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.9 points; MTUM is 6.8 times larger.
| MTUM | QLTY | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.50% |
| Net assets, as of Dec 31, 2025 | $20.5bn | $3.0bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +25.8% | +19.9% |
| What it tracks | MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 15% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 36.1% | 48.9% |
| Below its high | 7.1%, high on Jun 22, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, MTUM and QLTY hold 15% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
half
15% in common
On the same fields
MTUM and QLTY on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About MTUM
MTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Factor. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +25.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 126 positions, with the top ten at 36.1%. It sat 7.1% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
About QLTY
QLTY is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +19.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.50% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 41 positions, with the top ten at 48.9%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MTUM or QLTY?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MTUM returned +25.8% and QLTY +19.9%.
- Which is cheaper, MTUM or QLTY?
- MTUM is cheaper, by 0.35 percentage points a year. That is about $35 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, MTUM against QLTY, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mtum-vs-qlty
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). MTUM against QLTY. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mtum-vs-qlty
[MTUM against QLTY (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mtum-vs-qlty)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.