DGRW vs QLTY: Differences, Returns & Fees
DGRW and QLTY hold 35% of their weight in the same names, and QLTY returned +19.9% over the year. Net assets: $16.6bn on Jun 30, 2026 for WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund, and $4.5bn on May 31, 2026 for GMO U.S. Quality ETF.
DGRW costs 0.22 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.0 points; DGRW is 5.3 times larger.
| DGRW | QLTY | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.28% | 0.50% |
| Net assets, as of Dec 31, 2025 | $15.9bn | $3.0bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +12.9% | +19.9% |
| What it tracks | WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 35% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 36.1% | 48.9% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DGRW and QLTY hold 35% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
half
35% in common
On the same fields
DGRW and QLTY on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About DGRW
DGRW tracks an index of U.S. Quality Dividend Growth. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +12.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 197 positions, with the top ten at 36.1%.
About QLTY
QLTY is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +19.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.50% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 41 positions, with the top ten at 48.9%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DGRW or QLTY?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRW returned +12.9% and QLTY +19.9%.
- Which is cheaper, DGRW or QLTY?
- DGRW is cheaper, by 0.22 percentage points a year. That is about $22 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, DGRW against QLTY, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dgrw-vs-qlty
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). DGRW against QLTY. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dgrw-vs-qlty
[DGRW against QLTY (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dgrw-vs-qlty)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.