Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

CGDV vs DGRW: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGDV returned +15.8% to DGRW's +11.1%; 36% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CGDV and DGRW

Net assets: $39.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF, and $16.6bn on Jun 30, 2026 for WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund.

At a glance
+15.8%
CGDV total return, 1 year
+11.1%
DGRW total return, 1 year
0.33%
CGDV expense ratio
0.28%
DGRW expense ratio

Pair scorecard

DGRW costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.7 points.

CGDV vs DGRW: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCGDVDGRW
Return
Total return, 1 year+15.8%+11.1%
Drawdown
Below its high3.6%, high on Aug 13, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedWisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.33%0.28%
Net assets, CGDV as of Oct 27, 2026 and DGRW as of Jun 30, 2026$39.1bn$16.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common36%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund42.0%36.1%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Mar 4, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026 · 242 weekly returns
CGDV DGRW
Return
Total return edge CGDV +107.2% +70.2%
Annualized edge CGDV +16.9% +12.1%
Price return edge CGDV +93.0% +57.3%
Risk
Volatility edge DGRW (slight) 14.8% 13.9%
Max drawdown edge DGRW −21.1% −14.7%
Downside capture 88.1% 92.1%
Beta 0.93 0.89
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge CGDV 0.85 0.59
Sortino edge CGDV 1.28 0.88
Treynor 0.134 0.128
Calmar edge DGRW (slight) 0.80 0.82
Against the benchmark
Alpha +4.4% a year +0.2% a year
Alpha t-stat 1.70 0.19
Information ratio 0.68 −0.29
Tracking error 5.6% 4.0%

Each against its own benchmark: CGDV against IWD, Mar 4, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026; DGRW against VOO, May 31, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

CGDV returned more: +107.2% to +70.2%. DGRW swung slightly less: 13.9% to 14.8%. DGRW fell less at its worst: −14.7% to −21.1%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: CGDV vs DGRW: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCGDVDGRWEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+107.2%+70.2%CGDVPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+16.9%+12.1%CGDVTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+93.0%+57.3%CGDVPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility14.8%13.9%DGRW (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation9.8%9.3%DGRW (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−21.1%−14.7%DGRWDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture93.8%85.5%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture88.1%92.1%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.930.89Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.860.94Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.850.59CGDVReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.280.88CGDVReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1340.128Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.800.82DGRW (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIWDVOOThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+4.4% a year+0.2% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat1.700.19Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.7% to +9.4%−1.7% to +2.1%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.68−0.29Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error5.6%4.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 242 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

36%

By the books each fund has filed, CGDV and DGRW hold 36% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

36% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first CGDV DGRW
NVIDIA Corp 6.32% 7.94%
Microsoft Corp 7.64% 5.74%
Meta Platforms Inc 4.27% 2.97%
Broadcom Inc 4.67% 2.34%
Oracle Corp 3.22% 2.34%
Alphabet Inc 3.55% 2.31%
Apple Inc 2.21% 3.86%
Applied Materials Inc 1.85% 1.71%
AbbVie Inc 1.54% 2.07%
Eli Lilly & Co 1.91% 1.53%
Cisco Systems Inc 2.60% 1.44%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp 1.31% 1.59%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in CGDV
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd 3.49%
RTX Corp 3.16%
General Electric Co 3.05%
Comcast Corp 2.61%
Starbucks Corp 2.44%
Carrier Global Corp 2.36%
British American Tobacco PLC 2.26%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 2.19%
Only in DGRW
COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE) 2.88%
HOME DEPOT INC (THE) 2.81%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.34%
ALPHABET INC 2.31%
CATERPILLAR INC 1.80%
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP 1.59%
T-MOBILE US INC 1.48%
VISA INC 1.41%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of U.S. Quality Dividend Growth
Total return, 1 year +15.8% +11.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +27.5% (IWD) +13.7% (VOO)
Gap to its benchmark −11.7 pts vs IWD −2.6 pts vs VOO
Expense ratio 0.33% 0.28%
Already in the S&P 500 91.7% 96.7%
Holdings 53 197
Net assets, CGDV as of Oct 27, 2026 and DGRW as of Jun 30, 2026 $39.1bn $16.6bn

CGDV and DGRW on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-278E519562

CGDV and DGRW do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. CGDV follows No index, actively managed and DGRW follows WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 36% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 CGDV returned +15.8% and DGRW +11.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 4.7 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
CGDV

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.8% with distributions reinvested, against +27.5% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.

CGDV is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 42.0%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

DGRW

DGRW tracks an index of U.S. Quality Dividend Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +11.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 197 positions, with the top ten at 36.1%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or DGRW?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +15.8% and DGRW +11.1%.
Which is cheaper, CGDV or DGRW?
DGRW is cheaper, by 0.05 percentage points a year. That is about $5 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGDV and DGRW overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of CGDV and 97% of DGRW by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CGDV against DGRW, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-dgrw

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.