CGDV vs FELC: Differences, Returns & Fees

CGDV and FELC hold 40% of their weight in the same names, and FELC returned +19.2% over the year. Net assets: $38.9bn on Oct 8, 2026 for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF, and $8.6bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF.

FELC costs 0.15 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.7 points; CGDV is 4.5 times larger.

CGDV vs FELC: Differences, Returns & Fees
CGDVFELC
Expense ratio0.33%0.18%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$38.4bn$8.6bn
Total return, 1 year+18.5%+19.2%
What it tracksNo index, actively managedNo index, actively managed
Holdings in common40%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund38.7%38.4%
Below its high3.4%, high on Aug 13, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

+18.5%
CGDV total return, 1 year
+19.2%
FELC total return, 1 year
0.33%
CGDV expense ratio
0.18%
FELC expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CGDV and FELC hold 40% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

half

40% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding CGDV FELC
NVIDIA Corp 5.66% 7.95%
Microsoft Corp 5.81% 4.03%
Alphabet Inc 3.59% 3.69%
Broadcom Inc 5.16% 3.19%
Apple Inc 2.36% 7.00%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.33% 2.19%
Amazon.com Inc 1.88% 3.90%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.89% 1.54%
Eli Lilly & Co 3.15% 1.44%
Applied Materials Inc 3.12% 1.18%
General Electric Co 3.08% 1.17%
AbbVie Inc 1.35% 1.16%
Only in CGDV
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd 2.83%
British American Tobacco PLC 2.66%
Carrier Global Corp 2.64%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd 2.16%
Union Pacific Corp 2.12%
Capital Group Central Cash Fund 2.02%
International Paper Co 1.74%
TC Energy Corp 1.33%
Only in FELC
ALPHABET INC 2.40%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 2.11%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC DEL 1.94%
TESLA INC 1.29%
LAM RESEARCH CORP 1.22%
AMPHENOL CORPORATION NEW 0.92%
GE VERNOVA INC 0.89%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 0.86%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
FELC
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +18.5% +19.2%
Its benchmark over the same days +26.4% (IWD) not published
Gap to its benchmark −7.9 pts vs IWD not available
Expense ratio 0.33% 0.18%
Already in the S&P 500 91.0% 93.9%
Holdings 53 252
Net assets, CGDV as of Oct 8, 2026 and FELC as of Sep 30, 2026 $38.9bn $8.6bn

CGDV and FELC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About CGDV

CGDV is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 38.7%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +18.5% with distributions reinvested, against +26.4% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.

About FELC

FELC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +19.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 252 positions, with the top ten at 38.4%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or FELC?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +18.5% and FELC +19.2%.
Which is cheaper, CGDV or FELC?
FELC is cheaper, by 0.15 percentage points a year. That is about $15 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGDV and FELC overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 91% of CGDV and 94% of FELC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CGDV against FELC, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-felc

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.