Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

CGDV vs SPYM: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGDV returned +15.8% to SPYM's +13.7%; 39% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CGDV and SPYM

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $39.1bn for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF and $185.0bn for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF.

At a glance
+15.8%
CGDV total return, 1 year
+13.7%
SPYM total return, 1 year
0.33%
CGDV expense ratio
0.02%
SPYM expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SPYM costs 0.31 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.1 points; SPYM is 4.7 times larger.

CGDV vs SPYM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCGDVSPYM
Return
Total return, 1 year+15.8%+13.7%
Drawdown
Below its high3.6%, high on Aug 13, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedS&P 500 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.33%0.02%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$39.1bn$185.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common39%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund42.0%38.1%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Mar 4, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026 · 242 weekly returns
CGDV SPYM
Return
Total return edge CGDV +107.2% +87.9%
Annualized edge CGDV +16.9% +14.5%
Price return edge CGDV +93.0% +75.9%
Risk
Volatility edge CGDV (slight) 14.8% 16.3%
Max drawdown edge SPYM (slight) −21.1% −20.5%
Downside capture 88.1% 96.9%
Beta 0.93 0.96
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge CGDV 0.85 0.65
Sortino edge CGDV 1.28 0.99
Treynor 0.134 0.106
Calmar edge CGDV 0.80 0.71
Against the benchmark
Alpha +4.4% a year +0.4% a year
Alpha t-stat 1.70 0.53
Information ratio 0.68 0.00
Tracking error 5.6% 3.8%

Each against its own benchmark: CGDV against IWD, Mar 4, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026; SPYM against IVV, Nov 25, 2005 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

CGDV returned more: +107.2% to +87.9%. CGDV swung slightly less: 14.8% to 16.3%. SPYM fell slightly less at its worst: −20.5% to −21.1%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: CGDV vs SPYM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCGDVSPYMEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+107.2%+87.9%CGDVPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+16.9%+14.5%CGDVTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+93.0%+75.9%CGDVPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility14.8%16.3%CGDV (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation9.8%10.8%CGDV (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−21.1%−20.5%SPYM (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture93.8%94.1%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture88.1%96.9%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.930.96Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.860.95Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.850.65CGDVReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.280.99CGDVReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1340.106Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.800.71CGDVAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIWDIVVThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+4.4% a year+0.4% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat1.700.53Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.7% to +9.4%−1.2% to +2.0%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.680.00Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error5.6%3.8%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 242 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

39%

By the books each fund has filed, CGDV and SPYM hold 39% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

39% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first CGDV SPYM
NVIDIA Corp 6.32% 7.92%
Microsoft Corp 7.64% 5.92%
Alphabet Inc 3.55% 2.83%
Broadcom Inc 4.67% 2.44%
Apple Inc 2.21% 7.61%
Meta Platforms Inc 4.27% 2.05%
Amazon.com Inc 2.00% 3.73%
Eli Lilly & Co 1.91% 1.54%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 2.19% 1.34%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp 1.31% 1.11%
Micron Technology Inc 0.80% 1.57%
AbbVie Inc 1.54% 0.76%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in CGDV
British American Tobacco PLC 2.26%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd 2.08%
TC Energy Corp 1.01%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd 0.85%
Air Products and Chemicals Inc 0.80%
Capital Group Central Cash Fund 0.72%
Only in SPYM
ALPHABET INC CL C 2.26%
TESLA INC 1.72%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CL B 1.52%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 1.37%
VISA INC CLASS A SHARES 1.03%
JOHNSON + JOHNSON 0.97%
WALMART INC 0.80%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC A 0.69%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks the S&P 500
Total return, 1 year +15.8% +13.7%
Its benchmark over the same days +27.5% (IWD) +13.7% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark −11.7 pts vs IWD 0.0 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 0.33% 0.02%
Already in the S&P 500 91.7% 99.8%
Holdings 53 506
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $39.1bn $185.0bn
Former ticker none SPLG

CGDV and SPYM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-0ED0777E3D

CGDV and SPYM do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. CGDV follows No index, actively managed and SPYM follows S&P 500 Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 39% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 CGDV returned +15.8% and SPYM +13.7% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 2.1 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

SPYM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
CGDV

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.8% with distributions reinvested, against +27.5% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.

CGDV is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 42.0%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

SPYM

SPYM tracks the S&P 500. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.7% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.02% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 506 positions, with the top ten at 38.1%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or SPYM?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +15.8% and SPYM +13.7%.
Which is cheaper, CGDV or SPYM?
SPYM is cheaper, by 0.31 percentage points a year. That is about $31 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGDV and SPYM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of CGDV and 100% of SPYM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CGDV against SPYM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-spym

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.