QLTY vs USMV: Differences, Returns & Fees
QLTY and USMV hold 18% of their weight in the same names, and QLTY returned +19.9% over the year. Net assets: $4.5bn on May 31, 2026 for GMO U.S. Quality ETF, and $23.8bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF.
USMV costs 0.35 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 12.4 points; USMV is 7.5 times larger.
| QLTY | USMV | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.50% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, as of Dec 31, 2025 | $3.0bn | $22.8bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +19.9% | +7.5% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | MSCI USA Minimum Volatility (USD) Index |
| Holdings in common | 18% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 48.9% | 15.1% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, QLTY and USMV hold 18% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
half
18% in common
On the same fields
QLTY and USMV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About QLTY
QLTY is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +19.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.50% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 41 positions, with the top ten at 48.9%.
About USMV
USMV tracks the MSCI USA Min Vol Factor. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +7.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 176 positions, with the top ten at 15.1%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, QLTY or USMV?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QLTY returned +19.9% and USMV +7.5%.
- Which is cheaper, QLTY or USMV?
- USMV is cheaper, by 0.35 percentage points a year. That is about $35 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, QLTY against USMV, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qlty-vs-usmv
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). QLTY against USMV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qlty-vs-usmv
[QLTY against USMV (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qlty-vs-usmv)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.