QLTY vs RDVY: Differences, Returns & Fees
QLTY and RDVY hold 24% of their weight in the same names. Net assets: $4.5bn on May 31, 2026 for GMO U.S. Quality ETF, and $25.5bn on Oct 9, 2026 for First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF.
RDVY costs 0.03 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.3 points; RDVY is 6.3 times larger.
| QLTY | RDVY | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.50% | 0.47% |
| Net assets, as of Dec 31, 2025 | $3.0bn | $19.1bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +19.9% | +20.2% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Nasdaq US Rising Dividend Achievers Index |
| Holdings in common | 24% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 48.9% | 23.2% |
| Below its high | 4.9%, high on Aug 13, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, QLTY and RDVY hold 24% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
half
24% in common
On the same fields
QLTY and RDVY on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About QLTY
QLTY is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +19.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.50% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 41 positions, with the top ten at 48.9%.
About RDVY
RDVY tracks an index of Rising Dividend Achievers. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +20.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 72 positions, with the top ten at 23.2%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, QLTY or RDVY?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QLTY returned +19.9% and RDVY +20.2%.
- Which is cheaper, QLTY or RDVY?
- RDVY is cheaper, by 0.03 percentage points a year. That is about $3 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, QLTY against RDVY, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qlty-vs-rdvy
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). QLTY against RDVY. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qlty-vs-rdvy
[QLTY against RDVY (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qlty-vs-rdvy)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.