OEF vs QLTY: Differences, Returns & Fees

OEF and QLTY hold 39% of their weight in the same names, and QLTY returned +19.9% over the year. Net assets: $20.8bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares S&P 100 ETF, and $4.5bn on May 31, 2026 for GMO U.S. Quality ETF.

OEF costs 0.30 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.1 points; OEF is 9.6 times larger.

OEF vs QLTY: Differences, Returns & Fees
OEFQLTY
Expense ratio0.20%0.50%
Net assets, as of Dec 31, 2025$29.2bn$3.0bn
Total return, 1 year+16.8%+19.9%
What it tracksS&P 100No index, actively managed
Holdings in common39%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund52.6%48.9%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+16.8%
OEF total return, 1 year
+19.9%
QLTY total return, 1 year
0.20%
OEF expense ratio
0.50%
QLTY expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, OEF and QLTY hold 39% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

39% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding OEF QLTY
MICROSOFT 7.96% 7.17%
APPLE 9.84% 5.12%
ALPHABET CLASS A 4.13% 5.64%
AMAZON.COM INC 5.16% 3.90%
BROADCOM INC 3.45% 4.79%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 3.17% 4.32%
ELI LILLY 1.89% 2.52%
VISA CLASS A 1.32% 2.58%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.26% 4.22%
MASTERCARD CLASS A 0.95% 1.78%
LAM RESEARCH 0.80% 5.38%
MERCK & CO INC 0.72% 1.83%
Only in OEF
NVIDIA 11.11%
ALPHABET CLASS C 3.31%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 2.33%
TESLA INC 2.16%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 1.99%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 1.92%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 1.77%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 1.39%
Only in QLTY
Texas Instruments Inc 4.44%
KLA Corp 3.98%
Aramark 2.48%
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc 2.08%
General Electric Co 1.79%
Elevance Health Inc 1.75%
Cigna Group/The 1.60%
Constellation Brands Inc 1.53%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

OEF
iShares S&P 100 ETF
QLTY
GMO U.S. Quality ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
Issuer iShares GMO
What it is Tracks an index Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +16.8% +19.9%
Its benchmark over the same days not published +17.3% (VOO)
Gap to its benchmark not available +2.6 pts vs VOO
Expense ratio 0.20% 0.50%
Already in the S&P 500 99.9% 96.5%
Holdings 102 41
Net assets, OEF as of Oct 9, 2026 and QLTY as of May 31, 2026 $20.8bn $4.5bn

OEF and QLTY on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About OEF

OEF tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 102 positions, with the top ten at 52.6%.

About QLTY

QLTY is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +19.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.50% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 41 positions, with the top ten at 48.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, OEF or QLTY?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, OEF returned +16.8% and QLTY +19.9%.
Which is cheaper, OEF or QLTY?
OEF is cheaper, by 0.30 percentage points a year. That is about $30 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do OEF and QLTY overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of OEF and 96% of QLTY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, OEF against QLTY, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/oef-vs-qlty

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.