Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

MTUM vs SPMO: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MTUM and SPMO finished level, +18.4% against +18.4%, and they share 70% of their weight.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MTUM and SPMO

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $18.7bn for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF and $22.3bn for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF.

At a glance
+18.4%
MTUM total return, 1 year
+18.4%
SPMO total return, 1 year
0.15%
MTUM expense ratio
0.13%
SPMO expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SPMO costs 0.02 points a year less; both returned +18.4% over a year; SPMO is 1.2 times larger.

MTUM vs SPMO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMTUMSPMO
Return
Total return, 1 year+18.4%+18.4%
Drawdown
Below its high11.9%, high on Jun 22, 202610.2%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI USA Momentum SR Variant IndexS&P 500 Momentum Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.13%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$18.7bn$22.3bn
Holdings
Holdings in common70%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund35.5%50.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Oct 23, 2015 to Oct 23, 2026 · 574 weekly returns
MTUM SPMO
Return
Total return edge SPMO +355.8% +519.8%
Annualized edge SPMO +14.7% +18.0%
Price return edge SPMO +301.4% +442.9%
Risk
Volatility edge SPMO (slight) 20.2% 19.0%
Max drawdown edge SPMO −31.9% −28.3%
Downside capture 101.7% 93.8%
Beta 1.02 0.98
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge SPMO 0.67 0.84
Sortino edge SPMO 0.98 1.27
Treynor 0.135 0.164
Calmar edge SPMO 0.46 0.63
Against the benchmark
Alpha +1.3% a year +3.8% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.53 1.28
Information ratio 0.17 0.36
Tracking error 9.3% 9.7%

Each against its own benchmark: MTUM against MLRG, Apr 26, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026; SPMO against VOO, Oct 23, 2015 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

SPMO returned more: +519.8% to +355.8%. SPMO swung slightly less: 19.0% to 20.2%. SPMO fell less at its worst: −28.3% to −31.9%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: MTUM vs SPMO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMTUMSPMOEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+355.8%+519.8%SPMOPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+14.7%+18.0%SPMOTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+301.4%+442.9%SPMOPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility20.2%19.0%SPMO (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation13.8%12.6%SPMO (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−31.9%−28.3%SPMODeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture106.2%98.9%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture101.7%93.8%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.020.98Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.760.74Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.670.84SPMOReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.981.27SPMOReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1350.164Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.460.63SPMOAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkMLRGVOOThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+1.3% a year+3.8% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.531.28Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−3.7% to +6.3%−2.0% to +9.5%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.170.36Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error9.3%9.7%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 574 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

70%

By the books each fund has filed, MTUM and SPMO hold 70% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

70% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first MTUM SPMO
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 6.06% 5.48%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 5.00% 8.80%
INTEL CORPORATION 3.92% 4.60%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 3.45% 4.86%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 2.96% 3.57%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.62% 4.76%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 3.64% 2.53%
APPLIED MATERIAL INC 2.53% 2.28%
SANDISK 2.42% 2.20%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.07% 3.82%
LAM RESEARCH 1.89% 2.33%
CATERPILLAR INC 1.92% 1.88%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in MTUM
CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS CLASS A 1.83%
CHEVRON 1.65%
GE VERNOVA 1.46%
TEXAS INSTRUMENT 1.43%
FORTINET 1.05%
UNION PACIFIC 1.03%
ARISTA NETWORKS 0.83%
AMPHENOL CORP CLASS A 0.74%
Only in SPMO
Apple Inc 9.95%
RTX Corp 1.15%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 0.69%
Chubb Ltd 0.60%
Prologis Inc 0.59%
Lockheed Martin Corp 0.56%
US Bancorp 0.49%
Parker-Hannifin Corp 0.47%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Factor Tracks the S&P 500 Momentum
Total return, 1 year +18.4% +18.4%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.6% (MLRG) +13.7% (VOO)
Gap to its benchmark +4.8 pts vs MLRG +4.7 pts vs VOO
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.13%
Already in the S&P 500 93.2% 100.0%
Holdings 126 101
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $18.7bn $22.3bn

MTUM and SPMO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-66AD95E048

MTUM and SPMO are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. MTUM follows MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index and SPMO follows S&P 500 Momentum Index.
  2. Holdings in common (similar). 70% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 MTUM returned +18.4% and SPMO +18.4% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 0.0 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

MTUM and SPMO flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MTUM

MTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Factor. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 126 positions, with the top ten at 35.5%. It sat 11.9% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

SPMO

SPMO tracks the S&P 500 Momentum. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.13% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 101 positions, with the top ten at 50.7%. It sat 10.2% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MTUM or SPMO?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MTUM returned +18.4% and SPMO +18.4%.
Which is cheaper, MTUM or SPMO?
SPMO is cheaper, by 0.02 percentage points a year. That is about $2 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do MTUM and SPMO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 93% of MTUM and 100% of SPMO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MTUM against SPMO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mtum-vs-spmo

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.