Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
CGGR vs MTUM: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGGR returned +2.6% to MTUM's +18.4%; 17% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CGGR and MTUM
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $25.9bn for Capital Group Growth ETF and $18.7bn for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF.
Pair scorecard
MTUM costs 0.24 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 15.8 points; CGGR is 1.4 times larger.
| Measure | CGGR | MTUM |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +2.6% | +18.4% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | 11.9%, high on Jun 22, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $25.9bn | $18.7bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 17% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 39.7% | 35.5% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and MTUM hold 17% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
17% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
CGGR and MTUM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGGR and MTUM are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. CGGR follows No index, actively managed and MTUM follows MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index.
- Holdings in common. 17% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 CGGR returned +2.6% and MTUM +18.4% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 15.8 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
CGGR
CGGR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 78% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 39.7%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
MTUM
MTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Factor. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 126 positions, with the top ten at 35.5%. It sat 11.9% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or MTUM?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +2.6% and MTUM +18.4%.
- Which is cheaper, CGGR or MTUM?
- MTUM is cheaper, by 0.24 percentage points a year. That is about $24 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGGR against MTUM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-mtum
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). CGGR against MTUM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-mtum
[CGGR against MTUM (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-mtum)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.