Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

MTUM vs VOO: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MTUM returned +18.4% to VOO's +13.7%; 28% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MTUM and VOO

Net assets: $18.7bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF, and $1.0tn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF.

At a glance
+18.4%
MTUM total return, 1 year
+13.7%
VOO total return, 1 year
0.15%
MTUM expense ratio
0.03%
VOO expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VOO costs 0.12 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.7 points; VOO is far larger, $1.0tn against $20.4bn.

MTUM vs VOO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMTUMVOO
Return
Total return, 1 year+18.4%+13.7%
Drawdown
Below its high11.9%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI USA Momentum SR Variant IndexS&P 500 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.03%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$20.4bn$1.0tn
Holdings
Holdings in common28%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund35.5%39.1%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Apr 26, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026 · 704 weekly returns
MTUM VOO
Return
Total return edge MTUM (slight) +554.7% +508.9%
Annualized edge MTUM (slight) +14.9% +14.3%
Price return edge MTUM +459.1% +382.2%
Risk
Volatility edge VOO 19.0% 15.9%
Max drawdown edge Tie −31.9% −31.8%
Downside capture 101.7% 99.9%
Beta 1.02 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge VOO (slight) 0.73 0.80
Sortino edge VOO (slight) 1.07 1.16
Treynor 0.135 0.134
Calmar edge MTUM (slight) 0.47 0.45
Against the benchmark
Alpha +1.3% a year 0.0% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.53 0.51
Information ratio 0.17 0.02
Tracking error 9.3% 0.4%

Each against its own benchmark: MTUM against MLRG, Apr 26, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026; VOO against IVV, Sep 17, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

MTUM returned slightly more: +554.7% to +508.9%. VOO swung less: 15.9% to 19.0%. MTUM and VOO fell about the same at their worst: −31.9% and −31.8%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: MTUM vs VOO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMTUMVOOEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+554.7%+508.9%MTUM (slight)Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+14.9%+14.3%MTUM (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return+459.1%+382.2%MTUMPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility19.0%15.9%VOOSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation13.0%11.0%VOOLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−31.9%−31.8%TieDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture106.2%99.8%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture101.7%99.9%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.021.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.761.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.730.80VOO (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.071.16VOO (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1350.134Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.470.45MTUM (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkMLRGIVVThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+1.3% a year0.0% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.530.51Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−3.7% to +6.3%−0.1% to +0.2%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.170.02Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error9.3%0.4%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 704 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

28%

By the books each fund has filed, MTUM and VOO hold 28% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

28% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first MTUM VOO
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.62% 3.07%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.07% 2.46%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 5.00% 1.83%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 6.06% 1.52%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 2.96% 1.02%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 3.45% 0.97%
INTEL CORPORATION 3.92% 0.91%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 3.64% 0.65%
LAM RESEARCH 1.89% 0.62%
APPLIED MATERIAL INC 2.53% 0.62%
CHEVRON 1.65% 0.61%
CATERPILLAR INC 1.92% 0.57%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in MTUM
CLOUDFLARE CLASS A 0.54%
ASTERA LABS 0.39%
REVOLUTION MEDICINES 0.31%
ROYALTY PHARMA PLC CLASS A 0.23%
OKTA CLASS A 0.22%
TWILIO CLASS A 0.22%
ROIVANT SCIENCES LTD 0.18%
ATI 0.17%
Only in VOO
NVIDIA Corp 8.40%
Apple Inc 7.39%
Microsoft Corp 5.79%
Amazon.com Inc 3.72%
Broadcom Inc 2.54%
Meta Platforms Inc 2.43%
Tesla Inc 1.52%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.41%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Factor Tracks the S&P 500
Total return, 1 year +18.4% +13.7%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.6% (MLRG) +13.7% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark +4.8 pts vs MLRG 0.0 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.03%
Already in the S&P 500 93.2% 99.7%
Holdings 126 507
Net assets, MTUM as of Oct 27, 2026 and VOO as of Sep 30, 2026 $18.7bn $1.0tn

MTUM and VOO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-064F206147

MTUM and VOO are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. MTUM follows MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index and VOO follows S&P 500 Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 28% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 MTUM returned +18.4% and VOO +13.7% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 4.7 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

MTUM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MTUM

MTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Factor. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 126 positions, with the top ten at 35.5%. It sat 11.9% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VOO

VOO tracks the S&P 500. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.7% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 507 positions, with the top ten at 39.1%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MTUM or VOO?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MTUM returned +18.4% and VOO +13.7%.
Which is cheaper, MTUM or VOO?
VOO is cheaper, by 0.12 percentage points a year. That is about $12 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do MTUM and VOO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 93% of MTUM and 100% of VOO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MTUM against VOO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mtum-vs-voo

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.