Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IVV vs MTUM: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IVV returned +13.7% to MTUM's +18.4%; 27% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IVV and MTUM

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $885.1bn for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF and $18.7bn for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF.

At a glance
+13.7%
IVV total return, 1 year
+18.4%
MTUM total return, 1 year
0.03%
IVV expense ratio
0.15%
MTUM expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IVV costs 0.12 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.7 points; IVV is far larger, $885.1bn against $18.7bn.

IVV vs MTUM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIVVMTUM
Return
Total return, 1 year+13.7%+18.4%
Drawdown
Below its high11.9%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksS&P 500MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.03%0.15%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$885.1bn$18.7bn
Holdings
Holdings in common27%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund38.1%35.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Apr 26, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026 · 704 weekly returns
IVV MTUM
Return
Total return edge MTUM (slight) +507.9% +554.7%
Annualized edge MTUM (slight) +14.3% +14.9%
Price return edge MTUM +380.0% +459.1%
Risk
Volatility edge IVV 16.0% 19.0%
Max drawdown edge Tie −31.8% −31.9%
Downside capture 99.7% 101.7%
Beta 0.99 1.02
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge IVV (slight) 0.80 0.73
Sortino edge IVV (slight) 1.15 1.07
Treynor 0.081 0.135
Calmar edge MTUM (slight) 0.45 0.47
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.1% a year +1.3% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.33 0.53
Information ratio 0.00 0.17
Tracking error 1.2% 9.3%

Each against its own benchmark: IVV against SPY, May 26, 2000 to Oct 23, 2026; MTUM against MLRG, Apr 26, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

MTUM returned slightly more: +554.7% to +507.9%. IVV swung less: 16.0% to 19.0%. IVV and MTUM fell about the same at their worst: −31.8% and −31.9%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: IVV vs MTUM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIVVMTUMEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+507.9%+554.7%MTUM (slight)Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+14.3%+14.9%MTUM (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return+380.0%+459.1%MTUMPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility16.0%19.0%IVVSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation11.1%13.0%IVVLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−31.8%−31.9%TieDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture99.3%106.2%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture99.7%101.7%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.991.02Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared1.000.76Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.800.73IVV (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.151.07IVV (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0810.135Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.450.47MTUM (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkSPYMLRGThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.1% a year+1.3% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.330.53Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.4% to +0.5%−3.7% to +6.3%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.000.17Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error1.2%9.3%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 704 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

27%

By the books each fund has filed, IVV and MTUM hold 27% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

27% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IVV MTUM
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.83% 2.62%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.26% 2.07%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 1.57% 5.00%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 1.37% 6.06%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 1.11% 2.96%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 0.97% 3.45%
INTEL CORPORATION 0.70% 3.92%
CHEVRON 0.68% 1.65%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 0.66% 3.64%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP 0.55% 2.22%
COCA-COLA 0.53% 1.98%
MERCK & CO INC 0.53% 1.81%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IVV
NVIDIA 7.92%
APPLE 7.61%
MICROSOFT 5.93%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.73%
BROADCOM INC 2.45%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.05%
TESLA INC 1.73%
ELI LILLY 1.54%
Only in MTUM
CLOUDFLARE CLASS A 0.54%
ASTERA LABS 0.39%
REVOLUTION MEDICINES 0.31%
ROYALTY PHARMA PLC CLASS A 0.23%
OKTA CLASS A 0.22%
ROIVANT SCIENCES LTD 0.18%
ATI 0.17%
TECHNIPFMC PLC 0.16%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the S&P 500 Tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Factor
Total return, 1 year +13.7% +18.4%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.6% (SPY) +13.6% (MLRG)
Gap to its benchmark +0.1 pts vs SPY +4.8 pts vs MLRG
Expense ratio 0.03% 0.15%
Already in the S&P 500 99.8% 93.2%
Holdings 505 126
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $885.1bn $18.7bn

IVV and MTUM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-322A32F1A0

IVV and MTUM are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. IVV follows S&P 500 and MTUM follows MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 27% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 IVV returned +13.7% and MTUM +18.4% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 4.7 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

IVV and MTUM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IVV

IVV tracks the S&P 500. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.7% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 505 positions, with the top ten at 38.1%.

MTUM

MTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Factor. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 126 positions, with the top ten at 35.5%. It sat 11.9% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IVV or MTUM?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IVV returned +13.7% and MTUM +18.4%.
Which is cheaper, IVV or MTUM?
IVV is cheaper, by 0.12 percentage points a year. That is about $12 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IVV and MTUM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of IVV and 93% of MTUM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IVV against MTUM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ivv-vs-mtum

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.