Data as of .
BBC vs PBPH: which is really different?
BBC and PBPH hold 0% of their weight in the same names.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: BBC scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, BBC and PBPH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | BBC | PBPH |
|---|---|---|
| REVOLUTION MEDICINES INC | 1.35% | 0.37% |
| Only in BBC | Only in PBPH |
|---|---|
| ERASCA INC 2.19% | ELI LILLY & CO 14.74% |
| ENLIVEN THERAPEUTICS INC 1.81% | JOHNSON & JOHNSON 9.10% |
| TANGO THERAPEUTICS INC 1.71% | ABBVIE INC 6.53% |
| ORUKA THERAPEUTICS INC 1.68% | ROCHE HOLDING AG-GENUSSCHEIN 5.28% |
| SPYRE THERAPEUTICS INC 1.64% | NOVARTIS AG-REG 4.99% |
| ALUMIS INC 1.59% | MERCK & CO. INC. 4.71% |
| DIANTHUS THERAPEUTICS INC 1.54% | ASTRAZENECA PLC 4.60% |
| KODIAK SCIENCES INC 1.35% | NOVO NORDISK A/S-B 4.37% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jan 31, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBC | PBPH | BBC | PBPH | BBC | PBPH | |
| 3 months | +6.9% | +12.4% | +4.7 pts | +10.1 pts | +9.4 pts | +14.8 pts |
| 6 months | +22.7% | +15.6% | +4.7 pts | −2.5 pts | −1.5 pts | −8.7 pts |
| 1 year | +95.6% | not published | +79.0 pts | not published | +73.8 pts | not published |
| 3 years | +143.8% | not published | +65.3 pts | not published | +45.6 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +92.6% | +13.3% | −268.5 pts | −0.8 pts | −583.0 pts | −5.7 pts |
| BBC Virtus Biotech Clinical Trials ETF Holds 124 stocks in biotech, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | PBPH Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF Holds 51 stocks in biotech, 57% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Virtus | Portfolio Building Block |
| Theme | Biotech | Biotech |
| In the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 56.8% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 100.0% | 95.0% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 0.0% | 14.7% |
| Holdings | 124 | 51 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 16.2% | 62.7% |
| Expense ratio | 0.65% | 0.13% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.65% | 0.14% |
| Total return, 1 year | +95.6% | +13.3% (since launch on Nov 25, 2025) |
| vs the S&P 500 | +79.0 pts | −0.8 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | +73.8 pts | −5.7 pts |
| Below its high | −19.1% | −4.8% |
| Net assets | $37m | $36m |
BBC in plain words
By weight, 0% of BBC's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 16% of the fund across 124 positions, as filed for Apr 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +95.6% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 79.0 pts. It sits 19.1% below its all-time high of Feb 8, 2021.
PBPH in plain words
By weight, 57% of PBPH's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 95%. The top ten holdings are 63% of the fund across 51 positions, as filed for Jan 31, 2026. Since it launched on Nov 25, 2025 the fund returned +13.3% with distributions reinvested against +14.1% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 0.8 pts.
Questions people ask
- Do BBC and PBPH hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, BBC or PBPH?
- BBC has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and PBPH has 57%, so BBC differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, BBC or PBPH?
- BBC charges 0.65% a year and PBPH charges 0.13%, so PBPH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BBC against PBPH, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/bbc-vs-pbph Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.