PBPH vs XBI: which is really different?
PBPH and XBI hold 14% of their weight in the same names. Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Biotech ETF.
PBPH costs 0.22 points a year less; XBI is 10.4 times larger.
| PBPH | XBI | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.13% | 0.35% |
| Net assets, PBPH as of Jul 31, 2026 and XBI as of Oct 8, 2026 | $952m | $9.9bn |
| Total return, 1 year | not published | +45.0% |
| What it tracks | Biotech | Biotech |
| Holdings in common | 14% | |
| S&P 500, total return, since Nov 25, 2025 | +16.6% | |
| S&P 500, total return, 1 year | +17.3% | |
| Against the S&P 500, since Nov 25, 2025 | behind by 3.4 pts | |
| Against the S&P 500, 1 year | ahead by 27.7 pts | |
| Below its all-time high | 11.1%, high on Feb 8, 2021 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.
59% of PBPH's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 41% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.
13% of XBI's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 87% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 8, 2026.
A percentile among the 391 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, PBPH and XBI hold 14% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.
half
14% in common
14% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | PBPH | XBI | PBPH | XBI | PBPH | XBI |
| 3 months | +4.7% | −3.3% | +1.3 pts | −6.7 pts | +1.0 pts | −7.0 pts |
| 6 months | +11.0% | +18.9% | −4.1 pts | +3.8 pts | −12.2 pts | −4.3 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +45.0% | not published | +27.7 pts | not published | +21.4 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +114.6% | not published | +28.8 pts | not published | +7.3 pts |
| Since launch PBPH Nov 2025 · XBI Feb 2006 | +13.2% | +890.7% | −3.4 pts | +92.2 pts | −10.8 pts | −1,164.7 pts |
Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
As of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
PBPH in plain words
By weight, 59% of PBPH's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 95%. The top ten holdings are 62% of the fund across 53 positions, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. Since it first traded on Nov 25, 2025 the fund returned +13.2% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 3.4 pts.
XBI in plain words
By weight, 13% of XBI's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 17% of the fund across 165 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 the fund returned +45.0% with distributions reinvested against +17.3% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 27.7 pts. It sits 11.1% below its all-time high of Feb 8, 2021.
Questions people ask
- Do PBPH and XBI hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 14% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation.
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
ETFIQ, PBPH against XBI, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/pbph-vs-xbi
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). PBPH against XBI. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/pbph-vs-xbi
[PBPH against XBI (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/pbph-vs-xbi)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.