IBB vs PBPH: which is really different?
IBB and PBPH hold 22% of their weight in the same names. iShares Biotechnology ETF and Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF.
PBPH costs 0.31 points a year less; IBB is 10.8 times larger.
| IBB | PBPH | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.44% | 0.13% |
| Net assets, IBB as of Oct 8, 2026 and PBPH as of Jul 31, 2026 | $10.3bn | $952m |
| Total return, 1 year | +36.1% | not published |
| What it tracks | Biotech | Biotech |
| Holdings in common | 22% | |
| S&P 500, total return, 1 year | +17.3% | |
| S&P 500, total return, since Nov 25, 2025 | +16.6% | |
| Against the S&P 500, 1 year | ahead by 18.8 pts | |
| Against the S&P 500, since Nov 25, 2025 | behind by 3.4 pts | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.
40% of IBB's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 61% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 8, 2026.
60% of PBPH's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 40% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.
A percentile among the 391 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IBB and PBPH hold 22% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.
half
22% in common
22% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | IBB | PBPH | IBB | PBPH | IBB | PBPH |
| 3 months | +7.5% | +4.7% | +4.1 pts | +1.3 pts | +3.9 pts | +1.0 pts |
| 6 months | +21.9% | +11.0% | +6.8 pts | −4.1 pts | −1.3 pts | −12.2 pts |
| 1 year | +36.1% | not published | +18.8 pts | not published | +12.5 pts | not published |
| 3 years | +69.1% | not published | −16.7 pts | not published | −38.2 pts | not published |
| Since launch IBB Feb 2001 · PBPH Nov 2025 | +525.3% | +13.2% | −299.7 pts | −3.4 pts | −936.3 pts | −10.8 pts |
Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
As of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IBB in plain words
By weight, 40% of IBB's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 50% of the fund across 245 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 the fund returned +36.1% with distributions reinvested against +17.3% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 18.8 pts.
PBPH in plain words
By weight, 60% of PBPH's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 95%. The top ten holdings are 62% of the fund across 53 positions, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. Since it first traded on Nov 25, 2025 the fund returned +13.2% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 3.4 pts.
Questions people ask
- Do IBB and PBPH hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 22% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is a meaningful overlap. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation.
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
ETFIQ, IBB against PBPH, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/ibb-vs-pbph
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). IBB against PBPH. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/ibb-vs-pbph
[IBB against PBPH (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/ibb-vs-pbph)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.