ETFIQ
RankingsCompareHoldingsFlowsResearch
Ask ETFIQETF ModelsMy portfolioWeekly note
A
vs
B
Share on XDownload as PDFCompare their flowsAsk about these two funds

NBCM vs PIT: how they differ

NBCM and PIT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and PIT returned +64.3% over the year. Neuberger Commodity Strategy ETF and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF.

PIT costs 0.10 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 21.0 points; NBCM is 1.6 times larger.

NBCMPIT
Expense ratio0.65%0.55%
Net assets, NBCM as of May 31, 2026 and PIT as of Jun 30, 2026$425m$260m
Total return, 1 year+43.3%+64.3%
Holdings in common0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

+43.3%
NBCM total return, 1 year
+64.3%
PIT total return, 1 year
0.65%
NBCM expense ratio
0.55%
PIT expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, NBCM and PIT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding NBCM PIT
Only in NBCM
US BANK NA CINCINNATI 1.92%
MORGAN STANLEY BANK NA 1.68%
MERCK & CO INC 1.59%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 1.54%
BANK OF AMERICA CORP 1.40%
BANK OF NY MELLON CORP 1.37%
ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS OPER 1.22%
ABBOTT LABORATORIES 1.20%
Only in PIT
Other 4.43%
Other 2.96%
Other 2.83%
Brent Crude Futr Dec26 0.00%
Brent Crude Futr Feb27 0.00%
Cattle Feeder Fut Nov26 0.00%
Cocoa Future Dec26 0.00%
Coffee 'C' Future Dec26 0.00%

On the same fields

NBCM
Neuberger Commodity Strategy ETF
PIT
VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF
Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF
Issuer Neuberger Berman VanEck
What it is Actively managed Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +43.3% +64.3%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +26.1 pts +47.1 pts
Expense ratio 0.65% 0.55%
Holdings 149 32
Net assets, NBCM as of May 31, 2026 and PIT as of Jun 30, 2026 $425m $260m

NBCM and PIT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

NBCM in plain words

NBCM is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.65% a year.

Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +43.3% with distributions reinvested, against +40.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg Commodity Index.

PIT in plain words

PIT is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +64.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.55% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, NBCM or PIT?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, NBCM returned +43.3% and PIT +64.3%.
Which is cheaper, NBCM or PIT?
PIT is cheaper, by 0.10 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $10. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
COMB vs NBCMBCD vs NBCMFAAR vs NBCMCMDY vs NBCMBCD vs PITCMDY vs PITFAAR vs PITCMDT vs PIT
NBCM on its own →PIT on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
NBCM filings on SEC EDGAR ↗NBCM prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Neuberger Berman website ↗PIT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗PIT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗VanEck website ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, NBCM against PIT, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/nbcm-vs-pit

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.