ETFIQ
RankingsCompareHoldingsFlowsResearch
Ask ETFIQETF ModelsMy portfolioWeekly note
A
vs
B
Share on XDownload as PDFCompare their flowsAsk about these two funds

CMDY vs PIT: how they differ

CMDY and PIT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and PIT returned +64.3% over the year. iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF.

CMDY costs 0.27 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 27.8 points; CMDY is 2.8 times larger.

CMDYPIT
Expense ratio0.28%0.55%
Net assets, CMDY as of Oct 8, 2026 and PIT as of Jun 30, 2026$738m$260m
Total return, 1 year+36.5%+64.3%
Holdings in common0%
Below its high3.0%, high on Sep 10, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.

+36.5%
CMDY total return, 1 year
+64.3%
PIT total return, 1 year
0.28%
CMDY expense ratio
0.55%
PIT expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CMDY and PIT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding CMDY PIT
Only in CMDY
FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT CO 2.02%
CRH AMERICA FINANCE INC 144A 1.62%
SHEFFIELD RECEIVABLES CORP 144A 1.36%
DTE ELECTRIC CO 1.35%
SUMITOMO CORP OF AMERICA 1.35%
CONCORD MINUTEMEN CAPITAL CO 144A 1.34%
DUKE ENERGY CORP 144A 1.22%
ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND 144A 1.19%
Only in PIT
Other 4.43%
Other 2.96%
Other 2.83%
Brent Crude Futr Dec26 0.00%
Brent Crude Futr Feb27 0.00%
Cattle Feeder Fut Nov26 0.00%
Cocoa Future Dec26 0.00%
Coffee 'C' Future Dec26 0.00%

On the same fields

CMDY
iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF
PIT
VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF
Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF
Issuer iShares VanEck
What it is Tracks an index Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +36.5% +64.3%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +19.2 pts +47.1 pts
Expense ratio 0.28% 0.55%
Holdings 86 32
Net assets, CMDY as of Oct 8, 2026 and PIT as of Jun 30, 2026 $738m $260m

CMDY and PIT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

CMDY in plain words

CMDY tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +36.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. It sat 3.0% below its high of Sep 10, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

PIT in plain words

PIT is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +64.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.55% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CMDY or PIT?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CMDY returned +36.5% and PIT +64.3%.
Which is cheaper, CMDY or PIT?
CMDY is cheaper, by 0.27 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $27. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
CMDY vs COMBCMDY vs FAARCMDY vs NBCMBCD vs CMDYPIT vs SDCICOMT vs PITDBC vs PITFAAR vs PIT
CMDY on its own →PIT on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
CMDY filings on SEC EDGAR ↗CMDY prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗iShares page for CMDY ↗PIT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗PIT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗VanEck website ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, CMDY against PIT, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cmdy-vs-pit

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.