DBC vs PIT: how they differ
DBC is a commodity futures fund and PIT an actively managed commodity fund, and over the year PIT returned +64.3% against +51.0%. Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF.
PIT costs 0.30 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 13.3 points; DBC is 7.5 times larger.
| DBC | PIT | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.85% | 0.55% |
| Net assets, DBC as of Oct 8, 2026 and PIT as of Jun 30, 2026 | $2.0bn | $260m |
| Total return, 1 year | +51.0% | +64.3% |
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| Below its high | 14.8%, high on Jul 2, 2008 | |
On the same fields
DBC and PIT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DBC in plain words
DBC holds commodity futures. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +51.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.85% a year. It sat 14.8% below its high of Jul 2, 2008 on Oct 9, 2026.
PIT in plain words
PIT is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +64.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.55% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DBC or PIT?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DBC returned +51.0% and PIT +64.3%.
- Which is cheaper, DBC or PIT?
- PIT is cheaper, by 0.30 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $30. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, DBC against PIT, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dbc-vs-pit
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). DBC against PIT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dbc-vs-pit
[DBC against PIT (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dbc-vs-pit)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.