Which returned more over the last year, BCI or PIT?

In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BCI returned +40.2% and PIT +64.3%.

Which is cheaper, BCI or PIT?

BCI is cheaper, by 0.29 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $29. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Compare their flows Ask about these two funds

BCI vs PIT: how they differ

BCI and PIT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and PIT returned +64.3% over the year. abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF.

BCI costs 0.29 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 24.1 points; BCI is 13.4 times larger.

	BCI	PIT
Expense ratio	0.26%	0.55%
Net assets, BCI as of Oct 8, 2026 and PIT as of Jun 30, 2026	$3.5bn	$260m
Total return, 1 year	+40.2%	+64.3%
Holdings in common	0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

+40.2%

BCI total return, 1 year

+64.3%

PIT total return, 1 year

0.26%

BCI expense ratio

0.55%

PIT expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BCI and PIT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

50%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding BCI PIT

Only in BCI

United States Treasury 5.17%

United States Treasury 5.13%

United States Treasury 5.09%

United States Treasury 5.07%

United States Treasury 5.04%

United States Treasury 5.03%

United States Treasury 4.99%

Only in PIT

Other 4.43%

Other 2.96%

Other 2.83%

Brent Crude Futr Dec26 0.00%

Brent Crude Futr Feb27 0.00%

Cattle Feeder Fut Nov26 0.00%

Cocoa Future Dec26 0.00%

Coffee 'C' Future Dec26 0.00%

On the same fields

BCI

abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF

PIT

VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF

Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF

Issuer abrdn VanEck

What it is Tracks an index Actively managed

Total return, 1 year +40.2% +64.3%

S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%

Gap to the S&P 500 +23.0 pts +47.1 pts

Expense ratio 0.26% 0.55%

Holdings 16 32

Net assets, BCI as of Oct 8, 2026 and PIT as of Jun 30, 2026 $3.5bn $260m

BCI and PIT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

BCI in plain words

BCI tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +40.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year.

PIT in plain words

PIT is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +64.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.55% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BCI or PIT?: In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BCI returned +40.2% and PIT +64.3%.
Which is cheaper, BCI or PIT?: BCI is cheaper, by 0.29 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $29. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

BCI vs COMB BCI vs NBCM BCI vs SDCI BCI vs GSG FTGC vs PIT HGER vs PIT DBC vs PIT PDBC vs PIT

BCI on its own →PIT on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

BCI filings on SEC EDGAR ↗BCI prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗abrdn website ↗PIT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗PIT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗VanEck website ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, BCI against PIT, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bci-vs-pit

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.