ETFIQ
RankingsCompareHoldingsFlowsResearch
Ask ETFIQETF ModelsMy portfolioWeekly note
A
vs
B
Share on XDownload as PDFCompare their flowsAsk about these two funds

HGER vs PIT: how they differ

HGER and PIT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and PIT returned +64.3% over the year. Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF.

PIT costs 0.13 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 15.9 points; HGER is 18.6 times larger.

HGERPIT
Expense ratio0.68%0.55%
Net assets, HGER as of Oct 9, 2026 and PIT as of Jun 30, 2026$4.8bn$260m
Total return, 1 year+48.4%+64.3%
Holdings in common0%
Nasdaq-100, total return, 1 year+23.6%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund87.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

+48.4%
HGER total return, 1 year
+64.3%
PIT total return, 1 year
0.68%
HGER expense ratio
0.55%
PIT expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, HGER and PIT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding HGER PIT
Only in HGER
United States Treasury 17.27%
United States Treasury 16.31%
United States Treasury 15.49%
United States Treasury 15.40%
United States Treasury 13.41%
United States Treasury 6.91%
United States Treasury 2.72%
Only in PIT
Other 4.43%
Other 2.96%
Other 2.83%
Brent Crude Futr Dec26 0.00%
Brent Crude Futr Feb27 0.00%
Cattle Feeder Fut Nov26 0.00%
Cocoa Future Dec26 0.00%
Coffee 'C' Future Dec26 0.00%

On the same fields

HGER
Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF
PIT
VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF
Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF
Issuer Harbor VanEck
What it is Tracks an index of Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +48.4% +64.3%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +31.2 pts +47.1 pts
Expense ratio 0.68% 0.55%
Holdings 7 32
Net assets, HGER as of Oct 9, 2026 and PIT as of Jun 30, 2026 $4.8bn $260m

HGER and PIT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

HGER in plain words

HGER tracks an index of Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +48.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.68% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 7 positions, with the top ten at 87.5%.

PIT in plain words

PIT is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +64.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.55% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, HGER or PIT?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, HGER returned +48.4% and PIT +64.3%.
Which is cheaper, HGER or PIT?
PIT is cheaper, by 0.13 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $13. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
COMB vs HGERHGER vs NBCMCMDT vs HGERHGER vs SDCIBCI vs PITPDBC vs PITDBC vs PITCOMT vs PIT
HGER on its own →PIT on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
HGER filings on SEC EDGAR ↗HGER prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Harbor page for HGER ↗PIT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗PIT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗VanEck website ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, HGER against PIT, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hger-vs-pit

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.