CMDT vs HGER: how they differ
CMDT and HGER hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and HGER returned +48.4% over the year. PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund and Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF.
CMDT costs 0.03 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 16.8 points; HGER is 6.5 times larger.
| CMDT | HGER | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.65% | 0.68% |
| Net assets, CMDT as of Jun 30, 2026 and HGER as of Oct 9, 2026 | $751m | $4.8bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +31.6% | +48.4% |
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Nasdaq-100, total return, 1 year | +23.6% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 87.5% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CMDT and HGER hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
half
0% in common
On the same fields
CMDT and HGER on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CMDT in plain words
CMDT is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.65% a year.
Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +31.6% with distributions reinvested, against +40.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return.
HGER in plain words
HGER tracks an index of Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +48.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.68% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 7 positions, with the top ten at 87.5%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CMDT or HGER?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CMDT returned +31.6% and HGER +48.4%.
- Which is cheaper, CMDT or HGER?
- CMDT is cheaper, by 0.03 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $3. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
ETFIQ, CMDT against HGER, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cmdt-vs-hger
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). CMDT against HGER. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cmdt-vs-hger
[CMDT against HGER (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cmdt-vs-hger)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.