COMT vs HGER: how they differ

COMT and HGER hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and COMT returned +50.7% over the year. iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF and Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF.

COMT costs 0.20 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.3 points; HGER is 3.5 times larger.

COMTHGER
Expense ratio0.48%0.68%
Net assets, COMT as of Oct 8, 2026 and HGER as of Oct 9, 2026$1.4bn$4.8bn
Total return, 1 year+50.7%+48.4%
Holdings in common0%
Nasdaq-100, total return, 1 year+23.6%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund87.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

+50.7%
COMT total return, 1 year
+48.4%
HGER total return, 1 year
0.48%
COMT expense ratio
0.68%
HGER expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, COMT and HGER hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding COMT HGER
Only in COMT
FIDELITY NATL INFO SERV 144A 1.74%
CRH AMERICA FINANCE INC 144A 1.53%
EATON CAPITAL UNLIMITED 144A 1.06%
NTT FINANCE AMERICAS INC 144A 1.05%
HELVETICA FUNDING CO LLC 144A 0.98%
GLENCOVE FUNDING LLC 144A 0.97%
NEXTERA ENERGY CAPITAL HOLDINGS IN 144A 0.97%
ENBRIDGE INC 144A 0.94%
Only in HGER
United States Treasury 17.27%
United States Treasury 16.31%
United States Treasury 15.49%
United States Treasury 15.40%
United States Treasury 13.41%
United States Treasury 6.91%
United States Treasury 2.72%

On the same fields

COMT
iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF
HGER
Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF
Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index of Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy
Total return, 1 year +50.7% +48.4%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +33.5 pts +31.2 pts
Expense ratio 0.48% 0.68%
Holdings 176 7
Net assets, COMT as of Oct 8, 2026 and HGER as of Oct 9, 2026 $1.4bn $4.8bn

COMT and HGER on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

COMT in plain words

COMT tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +50.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.48% a year.

HGER in plain words

HGER tracks an index of Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +48.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.68% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 7 positions, with the top ten at 87.5%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, COMT or HGER?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COMT returned +50.7% and HGER +48.4%.
Which is cheaper, COMT or HGER?
COMT is cheaper, by 0.20 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $20. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, COMT against HGER, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/comt-vs-hger

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.