Which returned more over the last year, COMT or PDBC?

In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COMT returned +50.7% and PDBC +51.9%.

Which is cheaper, COMT or PDBC?

COMT is cheaper, by 0.11 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $11. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Compare their flows Ask about these two funds

COMT vs PDBC: how they differ

COMT and PDBC hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and PDBC returned +51.9% over the year. iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF.

COMT costs 0.11 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.2 points; PDBC is 5.6 times larger.

	COMT	PDBC
Expense ratio	0.48%	0.59%
Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026	$1.4bn	$7.9bn
Total return, 1 year	+50.7%	+51.9%
Holdings in common	0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.

+50.7%

COMT total return, 1 year

+51.9%

PDBC total return, 1 year

0.48%

COMT expense ratio

0.59%

PDBC expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, COMT and PDBC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.

50%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding COMT PDBC

Only in COMT

FIDELITY NATL INFO SERV 144A 1.74%

CRH AMERICA FINANCE INC 144A 1.53%

EATON CAPITAL UNLIMITED 144A 1.06%

NTT FINANCE AMERICAS INC 144A 1.05%

HELVETICA FUNDING CO LLC 144A 0.98%

GLENCOVE FUNDING LLC 144A 0.97%

NEXTERA ENERGY CAPITAL HOLDINGS IN 144A 0.97%

ENBRIDGE INC 144A 0.94%

Only in PDBC

POWERSHARES CAYMAN FUND 18.02%

On the same fields

COMT

iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF

PDBC

Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF

Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF

Issuer iShares Invesco

What it is Tracks an index Actively managed

Total return, 1 year +50.7% +51.9%

S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%

Gap to the S&P 500 +33.5 pts +34.6 pts

Expense ratio 0.48% 0.59%

Holdings 176 1

Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 $1.4bn $7.9bn

COMT and PDBC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

COMT in plain words

COMT tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +50.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.48% a year.

PDBC in plain words

PDBC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +51.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, COMT or PDBC?: In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COMT returned +50.7% and PDBC +51.9%.
Which is cheaper, COMT or PDBC?: COMT is cheaper, by 0.11 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $11. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

COMT vs HGER BCI vs COMT COMT vs FTGC COMT vs DBC CERY vs PDBC DBC vs PDBC PDBC vs SDCI FTGC vs PDBC

COMT on its own →PDBC on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

COMT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗COMT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗iShares page for COMT ↗PDBC filings on SEC EDGAR ↗PDBC prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Invesco page for PDBC ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, COMT against PDBC, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/comt-vs-pdbc

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.