ETFIQ
RankingsCompareHoldingsFlowsResearch
Ask ETFIQETF ModelsMy portfolioWeekly note
A
vs
B
Share on XDownload as PDFCompare their flowsAsk about these two funds

PDBC vs SDCI: how they differ

PDBC and SDCI hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and PDBC returned +51.9% over the year. Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF and USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund.

PDBC costs 0.01 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.9 points; PDBC is 9.7 times larger.

PDBCSDCI
Expense ratio0.59%0.60%
Net assets, PDBC as of Oct 8, 2026 and SDCI as of Oct 9, 2026$7.9bn$814m
Total return, 1 year+51.9%+42.0%
Holdings in common0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

+51.9%
PDBC total return, 1 year
+42.0%
SDCI total return, 1 year
0.59%
PDBC expense ratio
0.60%
SDCI expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, PDBC and SDCI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding PDBC SDCI
Only in PDBC
POWERSHARES CAYMAN FUND 18.02%
Only in SDCI
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 7.99%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 6.99%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 5.69%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 3.80%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 3.79%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 3.77%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 2.83%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 2.28%

On the same fields

PDBC
Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
SDCI
USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund
Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF
Issuer Invesco USCF
What it is Actively managed Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +51.9% +42.0%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +34.6 pts +24.7 pts
Expense ratio 0.59% 0.60%
Holdings 1 19
Net assets, PDBC as of Oct 8, 2026 and SDCI as of Oct 9, 2026 $7.9bn $814m

PDBC and SDCI on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

PDBC in plain words

PDBC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +51.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year.

SDCI in plain words

SDCI is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +42.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, PDBC or SDCI?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PDBC returned +51.9% and SDCI +42.0%.
Which is cheaper, PDBC or SDCI?
PDBC is cheaper, by 0.01 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $1. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
CMDT vs PDBCCMDY vs PDBCGSG vs PDBCCERY vs PDBCCOMB vs SDCIHGER vs SDCIBCI vs SDCIFTGC vs SDCI
PDBC on its own →SDCI on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
PDBC filings on SEC EDGAR ↗PDBC prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Invesco page for PDBC ↗SDCI filings on SEC EDGAR ↗SDCI prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗USCF website ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, PDBC against SDCI, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pdbc-vs-sdci

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.