ETFIQ
RankingsCompareHoldingsFlowsResearch
Ask ETFIQETF ModelsMy portfolioWeekly note
A
vs
B
Share on XDownload as PDFCompare their flowsAsk about these two funds

COMB vs SDCI: how they differ

COMB and SDCI hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and SDCI returned +42.0% over the year. GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF and USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund.

COMB costs 0.35 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.9 points; SDCI is 5.0 times larger.

COMBSDCI
Expense ratio0.25%0.60%
Net assets, COMB as of Oct 8, 2026 and SDCI as of Oct 9, 2026$161m$814m
Total return, 1 year+40.1%+42.0%
Holdings in common0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

+40.1%
COMB total return, 1 year
+42.0%
SDCI total return, 1 year
0.25%
COMB expense ratio
0.60%
SDCI expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, COMB and SDCI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding COMB SDCI
Only in COMB
Only in SDCI
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 7.99%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 6.99%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 5.69%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 3.80%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 3.79%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 3.77%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 2.83%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 2.28%

On the same fields

COMB
GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF
SDCI
USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund
Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF
Issuer GraniteShares USCF
What it is Actively managed Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +40.1% +42.0%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +22.9 pts +24.7 pts
Expense ratio 0.25% 0.60%
Holdings 0 19
Net assets, COMB as of Oct 8, 2026 and SDCI as of Oct 9, 2026 $161m $814m

COMB and SDCI on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

COMB in plain words

COMB is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year.

Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +40.1% with distributions reinvested, against +40.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg Commodity Total Return Index.

SDCI in plain words

SDCI is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +42.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, COMB or SDCI?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COMB returned +40.1% and SDCI +42.0%.
Which is cheaper, COMB or SDCI?
COMB is cheaper, by 0.35 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $35. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
CMDT vs COMBCMDY vs COMBCOMB vs GSGCERY vs COMBFAAR vs SDCINBCM vs SDCIBCD vs SDCICERY vs SDCI
COMB on its own →SDCI on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
COMB filings on SEC EDGAR ↗COMB prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗GraniteShares page for COMB ↗SDCI filings on SEC EDGAR ↗SDCI prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗USCF website ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, COMB against SDCI, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/comb-vs-sdci

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.