ETFIQ
RankingsCompareHoldingsFlowsResearch
Ask ETFIQETF ModelsMy portfolioWeekly note
A
vs
B
Share on XDownload as PDFCompare their flowsAsk about these two funds

CMDY vs COMB: how they differ

CMDY and COMB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and COMB returned +40.1% over the year. iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF.

COMB costs 0.03 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.6 points; CMDY is 4.6 times larger.

CMDYCOMB
Expense ratio0.28%0.25%
Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026$738m$161m
Total return, 1 year+36.5%+40.1%
Holdings in common0%
Below its high3.0%, high on Sep 10, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

+36.5%
CMDY total return, 1 year
+40.1%
COMB total return, 1 year
0.28%
CMDY expense ratio
0.25%
COMB expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CMDY and COMB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding CMDY COMB
Only in CMDY
FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT CO 2.02%
CRH AMERICA FINANCE INC 144A 1.62%
SHEFFIELD RECEIVABLES CORP 144A 1.36%
DTE ELECTRIC CO 1.35%
SUMITOMO CORP OF AMERICA 1.35%
CONCORD MINUTEMEN CAPITAL CO 144A 1.34%
DUKE ENERGY CORP 144A 1.22%
ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND 144A 1.19%
Only in COMB

On the same fields

CMDY
iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF
COMB
GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF
Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF
Issuer iShares GraniteShares
What it is Tracks an index Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +36.5% +40.1%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +19.2 pts +22.9 pts
Expense ratio 0.28% 0.25%
Holdings 86 0
Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 $738m $161m

CMDY and COMB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

CMDY in plain words

CMDY tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +36.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. It sat 3.0% below its high of Sep 10, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

COMB in plain words

COMB is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year.

Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +40.1% with distributions reinvested, against +40.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg Commodity Total Return Index.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CMDY or COMB?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CMDY returned +36.5% and COMB +40.1%.
Which is cheaper, CMDY or COMB?
COMB is cheaper, by 0.03 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $3. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
CMDY vs FAARCMDY vs PITCMDY vs NBCMCMDY vs GSGCOMB vs COMTCOMB vs DBCCOMB vs PITCOMB vs FAAR
CMDY on its own →COMB on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
CMDY filings on SEC EDGAR ↗CMDY prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗iShares page for CMDY ↗COMB filings on SEC EDGAR ↗COMB prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗GraniteShares page for COMB ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, CMDY against COMB, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cmdy-vs-comb

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.