Which returned more over the last year, COMB or PIT?

In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COMB returned +40.1% and PIT +64.3%.

Which is cheaper, COMB or PIT?

COMB is cheaper, by 0.30 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $30. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Compare their flows Ask about these two funds

COMB vs PIT: how they differ

COMB and PIT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and PIT returned +64.3% over the year. GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF.

COMB costs 0.30 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 24.2 points; PIT is 1.6 times larger.

	COMB	PIT
Expense ratio	0.25%	0.55%
Net assets, COMB as of Oct 8, 2026 and PIT as of Jun 30, 2026	$161m	$260m
Total return, 1 year	+40.1%	+64.3%
Holdings in common	0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

+40.1%

COMB total return, 1 year

+64.3%

PIT total return, 1 year

0.25%

COMB expense ratio

0.55%

PIT expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, COMB and PIT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

50%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding COMB PIT

Only in COMB

Only in PIT

Other 4.43%

Other 2.96%

Other 2.83%

Brent Crude Futr Dec26 0.00%

Brent Crude Futr Feb27 0.00%

Cattle Feeder Fut Nov26 0.00%

Cocoa Future Dec26 0.00%

Coffee 'C' Future Dec26 0.00%

On the same fields

COMB

GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF

PIT

VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF

Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF

Issuer GraniteShares VanEck

What it is Actively managed Actively managed

Total return, 1 year +40.1% +64.3%

S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%

Gap to the S&P 500 +22.9 pts +47.1 pts

Expense ratio 0.25% 0.55%

Holdings 0 32

Net assets, COMB as of Oct 8, 2026 and PIT as of Jun 30, 2026 $161m $260m

COMB and PIT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

COMB in plain words

COMB is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year.

Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +40.1% with distributions reinvested, against +40.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg Commodity Total Return Index.

PIT in plain words

PIT is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +64.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.55% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, COMB or PIT?: In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COMB returned +40.1% and PIT +64.3%.
Which is cheaper, COMB or PIT?: COMB is cheaper, by 0.30 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $30. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

COMB vs NBCM COMB vs GSG COMB vs FAAR BCD vs COMB BCD vs PIT PIT vs SDCI CERY vs PIT COMT vs PIT

COMB on its own →PIT on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

COMB filings on SEC EDGAR ↗COMB prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗GraniteShares page for COMB ↗PIT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗PIT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗VanEck website ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, COMB against PIT, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/comb-vs-pit

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.