Which returned more over the last year, COMT or PIT?

In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COMT returned +50.7% and PIT +64.3%.

Which is cheaper, COMT or PIT?

COMT is cheaper, by 0.07 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $7. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Compare their flows Ask about these two funds

COMT vs PIT: how they differ

COMT and PIT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and PIT returned +64.3% over the year. iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF.

COMT costs 0.07 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 13.6 points; COMT is 5.4 times larger.

	COMT	PIT
Expense ratio	0.48%	0.55%
Net assets, COMT as of Oct 8, 2026 and PIT as of Jun 30, 2026	$1.4bn	$260m
Total return, 1 year	+50.7%	+64.3%
Holdings in common	0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.

+50.7%

COMT total return, 1 year

+64.3%

PIT total return, 1 year

0.48%

COMT expense ratio

0.55%

PIT expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, COMT and PIT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.

50%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding COMT PIT

Only in COMT

FIDELITY NATL INFO SERV 144A 1.74%

CRH AMERICA FINANCE INC 144A 1.53%

EATON CAPITAL UNLIMITED 144A 1.06%

NTT FINANCE AMERICAS INC 144A 1.05%

HELVETICA FUNDING CO LLC 144A 0.98%

GLENCOVE FUNDING LLC 144A 0.97%

NEXTERA ENERGY CAPITAL HOLDINGS IN 144A 0.97%

ENBRIDGE INC 144A 0.94%

Only in PIT

Other 4.43%

Other 2.96%

Other 2.83%

Brent Crude Futr Dec26 0.00%

Brent Crude Futr Feb27 0.00%

Cattle Feeder Fut Nov26 0.00%

Cocoa Future Dec26 0.00%

Coffee 'C' Future Dec26 0.00%

On the same fields

COMT

iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF

PIT

VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF

Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF

Issuer iShares VanEck

What it is Tracks an index Actively managed

Total return, 1 year +50.7% +64.3%

S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%

Gap to the S&P 500 +33.5 pts +47.1 pts

Expense ratio 0.48% 0.55%

Holdings 176 32

Net assets, COMT as of Oct 8, 2026 and PIT as of Jun 30, 2026 $1.4bn $260m

COMT and PIT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

COMT in plain words

COMT tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +50.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.48% a year.

PIT in plain words

PIT is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +64.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.55% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, COMT or PIT?: In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COMT returned +50.7% and PIT +64.3%.
Which is cheaper, COMT or PIT?: COMT is cheaper, by 0.07 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $7. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

COMT vs FAAR COMB vs COMT COMT vs NBCM COMT vs SDCI DBC vs PIT FTGC vs PIT BCI vs PIT HGER vs PIT

COMT on its own →PIT on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

COMT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗COMT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗iShares page for COMT ↗PIT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗PIT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗VanEck website ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, COMT against PIT, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/comt-vs-pit

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.