COMT vs SDCI: how they differ

COMT and SDCI hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and COMT returned +50.7% over the year. iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF and USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund.

COMT costs 0.12 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.7 points; COMT is 1.7 times larger.

COMTSDCI
Expense ratio0.48%0.60%
Net assets, COMT as of Oct 8, 2026 and SDCI as of Oct 9, 2026$1.4bn$814m
Total return, 1 year+50.7%+42.0%
Holdings in common0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

+50.7%
COMT total return, 1 year
+42.0%
SDCI total return, 1 year
0.48%
COMT expense ratio
0.60%
SDCI expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, COMT and SDCI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding COMT SDCI
Only in COMT
FIDELITY NATL INFO SERV 144A 1.74%
CRH AMERICA FINANCE INC 144A 1.53%
EATON CAPITAL UNLIMITED 144A 1.06%
NTT FINANCE AMERICAS INC 144A 1.05%
HELVETICA FUNDING CO LLC 144A 0.98%
GLENCOVE FUNDING LLC 144A 0.97%
NEXTERA ENERGY CAPITAL HOLDINGS IN 144A 0.97%
ENBRIDGE INC 144A 0.94%
Only in SDCI
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 7.99%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 6.99%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 5.69%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 3.80%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 3.79%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 3.77%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 2.83%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 2.28%

On the same fields

COMT
iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF
SDCI
USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund
Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF
Issuer iShares USCF
What it is Tracks an index Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +50.7% +42.0%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +33.5 pts +24.7 pts
Expense ratio 0.48% 0.60%
Holdings 176 19
Net assets, COMT as of Oct 8, 2026 and SDCI as of Oct 9, 2026 $1.4bn $814m

COMT and SDCI on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

COMT in plain words

COMT tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +50.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.48% a year.

SDCI in plain words

SDCI is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +42.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, COMT or SDCI?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COMT returned +50.7% and SDCI +42.0%.
Which is cheaper, COMT or SDCI?
COMT is cheaper, by 0.12 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $12. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, COMT against SDCI, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/comt-vs-sdci

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.