CERY vs SDCI: how they differ

CERY and SDCI hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and CERY returned +45.4% over the year. State Street SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF and USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund.

CERY costs 0.32 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.4 points; CERY is 1.4 times larger.

CERYSDCI
Expense ratio0.28%0.60%
Net assets, CERY as of Oct 8, 2026 and SDCI as of Oct 9, 2026$1.1bn$814m
Total return, 1 year+45.4%+42.0%
Holdings in common0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

+45.4%
CERY total return, 1 year
+42.0%
SDCI total return, 1 year
0.28%
CERY expense ratio
0.60%
SDCI expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CERY and SDCI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding CERY SDCI
Only in CERY
TRS USD BERYTR 5.91%
Only in SDCI
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 7.99%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 6.99%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 5.69%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 3.80%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 3.79%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 3.77%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 2.83%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 2.28%

On the same fields

CERY
State Street SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
SDCI
USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund
Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF
What it is Tracks an index Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +45.4% +42.0%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +28.2 pts +24.7 pts
Expense ratio 0.28% 0.60%
Holdings 1 19
Net assets, CERY as of Oct 8, 2026 and SDCI as of Oct 9, 2026 $1.1bn $814m

CERY and SDCI on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

CERY in plain words

CERY tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +45.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year.

SDCI in plain words

SDCI is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +42.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CERY or SDCI?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CERY returned +45.4% and SDCI +42.0%.
Which is cheaper, CERY or SDCI?
CERY is cheaper, by 0.32 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $32. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, CERY against SDCI, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cery-vs-sdci

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.