CERY vs CMDY: how they differ
CERY and CMDY hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and CERY returned +45.4% over the year. State Street SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF and iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF.
Both cost 0.28% a year; their one-year returns differ by 8.9 points; CERY is 1.5 times larger.
| CERY | CMDY | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.28% | 0.28% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 | $1.1bn | $738m |
| Total return, 1 year | +45.4% | +36.5% |
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Below its high | 3.0%, high on Sep 10, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CERY and CMDY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.
half
0% in common
On the same fields
CERY and CMDY on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CERY in plain words
CERY tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +45.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year.
CMDY in plain words
CMDY tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +36.5% with distributions reinvested. It sat 3.0% below its high of Sep 10, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
ETFIQ, CERY against CMDY, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cery-vs-cmdy
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). CERY against CMDY. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cery-vs-cmdy
[CERY against CMDY (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cery-vs-cmdy)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.