CMDY vs COMT: how they differ

CMDY and COMT hold 20% of their weight in the same names, and COMT returned +50.7% over the year. iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF and iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF.

CMDY costs 0.20 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 14.2 points; COMT is 1.9 times larger.

CMDYCOMT
Expense ratio0.28%0.48%
Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026$738m$1.4bn
Total return, 1 year+36.5%+50.7%
Holdings in common20%
Below its high3.0%, high on Sep 10, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.

+36.5%
CMDY total return, 1 year
+50.7%
COMT total return, 1 year
0.28%
CMDY expense ratio
0.48%
COMT expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CMDY and COMT hold 20% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.

half

20% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding CMDY COMT
CRH AMERICA FINANCE INC 144A 1.62% 1.53%
EATON CAPITAL UNLIMITED 144A 1.15% 1.06%
NTT FINANCE AMERICAS INC 144A 1.15% 1.05%
FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT CO 2.02% 0.97%
GLENCOVE FUNDING LLC 144A 1.05% 0.97%
FIDELITY NATL INFO SERV 144A 0.92% 1.74%
PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (THE) 144A 0.98% 0.91%
DTE ELECTRIC CO 1.35% 0.80%
ENBRIDGE (US) INC 144A 0.79% 0.94%
AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION 0.81% 0.75%
SPIRE INC 144A 1.12% 0.74%
SUMITOMO CORP OF AMERICA 1.35% 0.71%
Only in CMDY
SHEFFIELD RECEIVABLES CORP 144A 1.36%
DUKE ENERGY CORP 144A 1.22%
ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND 144A 1.19%
ONTARIO (PROVINCE OF) 1.15%
S&P GLOBAL INC 144A 1.14%
DTE ELECTRIC CO 1.12%
IONIC IV 1.08%
AUTOBAHN FUNDING CO LLC 144A 1.05%
Only in COMT
ASB BANK LIMITED 144A 0.87%
CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE 0.87%
LLOYDS BANK PLC 144A 0.87%
UNITED OVERSEAS BK LTD 144A 0.85%
COMMERZBANK AG (NEW YORK BRANCH) 0.84%
MUFG BANK LTD (NEW YORK BRANCH) 0.84%
SKANDINAVISKA ENSKILDA BANKEN AB 144A 0.84%
DNB BANK ASA 144A 0.83%

On the same fields

CMDY
iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF
COMT
iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF
Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +36.5% +50.7%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +19.2 pts +33.5 pts
Expense ratio 0.28% 0.48%
Holdings 86 176
Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 $738m $1.4bn

CMDY and COMT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

CMDY in plain words

CMDY tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +36.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. It sat 3.0% below its high of Sep 10, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

COMT in plain words

COMT tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +50.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.48% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CMDY or COMT?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CMDY returned +36.5% and COMT +50.7%.
Which is cheaper, CMDY or COMT?
CMDY is cheaper, by 0.20 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $20. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, CMDY against COMT, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cmdy-vs-comt

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.