Which returned more over the last year, CMDY or PDBC?

In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CMDY returned +36.5% and PDBC +51.9%.

Which is cheaper, CMDY or PDBC?

CMDY is cheaper, by 0.31 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $31. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Compare their flows Ask about these two funds

CMDY vs PDBC: how they differ

CMDY and PDBC hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and PDBC returned +51.9% over the year. iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF.

CMDY costs 0.31 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 15.4 points; PDBC is 10.7 times larger.

	CMDY	PDBC
Expense ratio	0.28%	0.59%
Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026	$738m	$7.9bn
Total return, 1 year	+36.5%	+51.9%
Holdings in common	0%
Below its high	3.0%, high on Sep 10, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.

+36.5%

CMDY total return, 1 year

+51.9%

PDBC total return, 1 year

0.28%

CMDY expense ratio

0.59%

PDBC expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CMDY and PDBC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.

50%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding CMDY PDBC

Only in CMDY

FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT CO 2.02%

CRH AMERICA FINANCE INC 144A 1.62%

SHEFFIELD RECEIVABLES CORP 144A 1.36%

DTE ELECTRIC CO 1.35%

SUMITOMO CORP OF AMERICA 1.35%

CONCORD MINUTEMEN CAPITAL CO 144A 1.34%

DUKE ENERGY CORP 144A 1.22%

ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND 144A 1.19%

Only in PDBC

POWERSHARES CAYMAN FUND 18.02%

On the same fields

CMDY

iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF

PDBC

Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF

Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF

Issuer iShares Invesco

What it is Tracks an index Actively managed

Total return, 1 year +36.5% +51.9%

S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%

Gap to the S&P 500 +19.2 pts +34.6 pts

Expense ratio 0.28% 0.59%

Holdings 86 1

Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 $738m $7.9bn

CMDY and PDBC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

CMDY in plain words

CMDY tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +36.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. It sat 3.0% below its high of Sep 10, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

PDBC in plain words

PDBC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +51.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CMDY or PDBC?: In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CMDY returned +36.5% and PDBC +51.9%.
Which is cheaper, CMDY or PDBC?: CMDY is cheaper, by 0.31 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $31. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

CMDY vs HGER CMDY vs DBC CMDY vs GSG CMDY vs NBCM PDBC vs PIT COMB vs PDBC PDBC vs SDCI GSG vs PDBC

CMDY on its own →PDBC on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

CMDY filings on SEC EDGAR ↗CMDY prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗iShares page for CMDY ↗PDBC filings on SEC EDGAR ↗PDBC prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Invesco page for PDBC ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, CMDY against PDBC, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cmdy-vs-pdbc

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.