ETFIQ
RankingsCompareHoldingsFlowsResearch
Ask ETFIQETF ModelsMy portfolioWeekly note
A
vs
B
Share on XDownload as PDFCompare their flowsAsk about these two funds

CMDY vs NBCM: how they differ

CMDY and NBCM hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and NBCM returned +43.3% over the year. iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF and Neuberger Commodity Strategy ETF.

CMDY costs 0.37 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.8 points; CMDY is 1.7 times larger.

CMDYNBCM
Expense ratio0.28%0.65%
Net assets, CMDY as of Oct 8, 2026 and NBCM as of May 31, 2026$738m$425m
Total return, 1 year+36.5%+43.3%
Holdings in common0%
Below its high3.0%, high on Sep 10, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

+36.5%
CMDY total return, 1 year
+43.3%
NBCM total return, 1 year
0.28%
CMDY expense ratio
0.65%
NBCM expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CMDY and NBCM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding CMDY NBCM
Only in CMDY
FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT CO 2.02%
CRH AMERICA FINANCE INC 144A 1.62%
SHEFFIELD RECEIVABLES CORP 144A 1.36%
DTE ELECTRIC CO 1.35%
SUMITOMO CORP OF AMERICA 1.35%
CONCORD MINUTEMEN CAPITAL CO 144A 1.34%
DUKE ENERGY CORP 144A 1.22%
ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND 144A 1.19%
Only in NBCM
US BANK NA CINCINNATI 1.92%
MORGAN STANLEY BANK NA 1.68%
MERCK & CO INC 1.59%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 1.54%
BANK OF AMERICA CORP 1.40%
BANK OF NY MELLON CORP 1.37%
ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS OPER 1.22%
ABBOTT LABORATORIES 1.20%

On the same fields

CMDY
iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF
NBCM
Neuberger Commodity Strategy ETF
Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF
Issuer iShares Neuberger Berman
What it is Tracks an index Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +36.5% +43.3%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +19.2 pts +26.1 pts
Expense ratio 0.28% 0.65%
Holdings 86 149
Net assets, CMDY as of Oct 8, 2026 and NBCM as of May 31, 2026 $738m $425m

CMDY and NBCM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

CMDY in plain words

CMDY tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +36.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. It sat 3.0% below its high of Sep 10, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

NBCM in plain words

NBCM is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.65% a year.

Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +43.3% with distributions reinvested, against +40.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg Commodity Index.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CMDY or NBCM?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CMDY returned +36.5% and NBCM +43.3%.
Which is cheaper, CMDY or NBCM?
CMDY is cheaper, by 0.37 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $37. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
BCD vs CMDYCMDY vs PITCMDY vs FAARCMDY vs SDCICOMT vs NBCMDBC vs NBCMNBCM vs PITFAAR vs NBCM
CMDY on its own →NBCM on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
CMDY filings on SEC EDGAR ↗CMDY prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗iShares page for CMDY ↗NBCM filings on SEC EDGAR ↗NBCM prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Neuberger Berman website ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, CMDY against NBCM, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cmdy-vs-nbcm

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.