FAAR vs NBCM: how they differ

FAAR and NBCM hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and NBCM returned +43.3% over the year. First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF and Neuberger Commodity Strategy ETF.

NBCM costs 0.33 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 23.6 points; NBCM is 1.8 times larger.

FAARNBCM
Expense ratio0.98%0.65%
Net assets, FAAR as of Oct 8, 2026 and NBCM as of May 31, 2026$241m$425m
Total return, 1 year+19.7%+43.3%
Holdings in common0%
Below its high3.9%, high on May 18, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

+19.7%
FAAR total return, 1 year
+43.3%
NBCM total return, 1 year
0.98%
FAAR expense ratio
0.65%
NBCM expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FAAR and NBCM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding FAAR NBCM
Only in FAAR
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 11.19%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 8.40%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 8.38%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 8.36%
Only in NBCM
US BANK NA CINCINNATI 1.92%
MORGAN STANLEY BANK NA 1.68%
MERCK & CO INC 1.59%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 1.54%
BANK OF AMERICA CORP 1.40%
BANK OF NY MELLON CORP 1.37%
ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS OPER 1.22%
ABBOTT LABORATORIES 1.20%

On the same fields

FAAR
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF
NBCM
Neuberger Commodity Strategy ETF
Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF
What it is Actively managed Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +19.7% +43.3%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +2.4 pts +26.1 pts
Expense ratio 0.98% 0.65%
Holdings 4 149
Net assets, FAAR as of Oct 8, 2026 and NBCM as of May 31, 2026 $241m $425m

FAAR and NBCM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

FAAR in plain words

FAAR is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.98% a year. It sat 3.9% below its high of May 18, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +19.7% with distributions reinvested, against +40.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg Commodity Index.

NBCM in plain words

NBCM is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.65% a year.

Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +43.3% with distributions reinvested, against +40.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg Commodity Index.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FAAR or NBCM?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FAAR returned +19.7% and NBCM +43.3%.
Which is cheaper, FAAR or NBCM?
NBCM is cheaper, by 0.33 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $33. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, FAAR against NBCM, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/faar-vs-nbcm

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.