FAAR vs HGER: how they differ

FAAR and HGER hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and HGER returned +48.4% over the year. First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF and Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF.

HGER costs 0.30 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 28.7 points; HGER is far larger, $4.8bn against $241m.

FAARHGER
Expense ratio0.98%0.68%
Net assets, FAAR as of Oct 8, 2026 and HGER as of Oct 9, 2026$241m$4.8bn
Total return, 1 year+19.7%+48.4%
Holdings in common0%
Nasdaq-100, total return, 1 year+23.6%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund87.5%
Below its high3.9%, high on May 18, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

+19.7%
FAAR total return, 1 year
+48.4%
HGER total return, 1 year
0.98%
FAAR expense ratio
0.68%
HGER expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FAAR and HGER hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding FAAR HGER
Only in FAAR
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 11.19%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 8.40%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 8.38%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 8.36%
Only in HGER
United States Treasury 17.27%
United States Treasury 16.31%
United States Treasury 15.49%
United States Treasury 15.40%
United States Treasury 13.41%
United States Treasury 6.91%
United States Treasury 2.72%

On the same fields

FAAR
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF
HGER
Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF
Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy
Total return, 1 year +19.7% +48.4%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +2.4 pts +31.2 pts
Expense ratio 0.98% 0.68%
Holdings 4 7
Net assets, FAAR as of Oct 8, 2026 and HGER as of Oct 9, 2026 $241m $4.8bn

FAAR and HGER on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

FAAR in plain words

FAAR is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.98% a year. It sat 3.9% below its high of May 18, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +19.7% with distributions reinvested, against +40.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg Commodity Index.

HGER in plain words

HGER tracks an index of Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +48.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.68% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 7 positions, with the top ten at 87.5%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FAAR or HGER?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FAAR returned +19.7% and HGER +48.4%.
Which is cheaper, FAAR or HGER?
HGER is cheaper, by 0.30 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $30. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, FAAR against HGER, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/faar-vs-hger

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.