BCD vs HGER: how they differ
BCD and HGER hold 13% of their weight in the same names, and HGER returned +48.4% over the year. abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF and Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF.
BCD costs 0.38 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 16.6 points; HGER is 10.9 times larger.
| BCD | HGER | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.30% | 0.68% |
| Net assets, BCD as of Oct 8, 2026 and HGER as of Oct 9, 2026 | $445m | $4.8bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +31.8% | +48.4% |
| Holdings in common | 13% | |
| Nasdaq-100, total return, 1 year | +23.6% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 87.5% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, BCD and HGER hold 13% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
half
13% in common
On the same fields
BCD and HGER on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BCD in plain words
BCD tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +31.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year.
HGER in plain words
HGER tracks an index of Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +48.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.68% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 7 positions, with the top ten at 87.5%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BCD or HGER?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BCD returned +31.8% and HGER +48.4%.
- Which is cheaper, BCD or HGER?
- BCD is cheaper, by 0.38 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $38. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
ETFIQ, BCD against HGER, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bcd-vs-hger
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). BCD against HGER. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bcd-vs-hger
[BCD against HGER (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bcd-vs-hger)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.