ETFIQ
RankingsCompareHoldingsFlowsResearch
Ask ETFIQETF ModelsMy portfolioWeekly note
A
vs
B
Share on XDownload as PDFCompare their flowsAsk about these two funds

BCD vs FAAR: how they differ

BCD and FAAR hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and BCD returned +31.8% over the year. abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF.

BCD costs 0.68 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 12.1 points; BCD is 1.8 times larger.

BCDFAAR
Expense ratio0.30%0.98%
Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026$445m$241m
Total return, 1 year+31.8%+19.7%
Holdings in common0%
Below its high3.9%, high on May 18, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

+31.8%
BCD total return, 1 year
+19.7%
FAAR total return, 1 year
0.30%
BCD expense ratio
0.98%
FAAR expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BCD and FAAR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding BCD FAAR
Only in BCD
United States Treasury 5.20%
United States Treasury 5.20%
United States Treasury 5.19%
United States Treasury 5.18%
United States Treasury 4.95%
United States Treasury 4.94%
United States Treasury 4.93%
United States Treasury 4.93%
Only in FAAR
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 11.19%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 8.40%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 8.38%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 8.36%

On the same fields

BCD
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF
FAAR
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF
Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF
Issuer abrdn First Trust
What it is Tracks an index Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +31.8% +19.7%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +14.6 pts +2.4 pts
Expense ratio 0.30% 0.98%
Holdings 17 4
Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 $445m $241m

BCD and FAAR on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

BCD in plain words

BCD tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +31.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year.

FAAR in plain words

FAAR is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.98% a year. It sat 3.9% below its high of May 18, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +19.7% with distributions reinvested, against +40.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg Commodity Index.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BCD or FAAR?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BCD returned +31.8% and FAAR +19.7%.
Which is cheaper, BCD or FAAR?
BCD is cheaper, by 0.68 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $68. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
BCD vs COMBBCD vs PDBCBCD vs PITBCD vs NBCMFAAR vs NBCMCMDT vs FAARFAAR vs PITFAAR vs SDCI
BCD on its own →FAAR on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
BCD filings on SEC EDGAR ↗BCD prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗abrdn website ↗FAAR filings on SEC EDGAR ↗FAAR prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗First Trust page for FAAR ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, BCD against FAAR, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bcd-vs-faar

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.