ETFIQ
RankingsCompareHoldingsFlowsResearch
Ask ETFIQETF ModelsMy portfolioWeekly note
A
vs
B
Share on XDownload as PDFCompare their flowsAsk about these two funds

BCD vs PIT: how they differ

BCD and PIT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and PIT returned +64.3% over the year. abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF.

BCD costs 0.25 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 32.5 points; BCD is 1.7 times larger.

BCDPIT
Expense ratio0.30%0.55%
Net assets, BCD as of Oct 8, 2026 and PIT as of Jun 30, 2026$445m$260m
Total return, 1 year+31.8%+64.3%
Holdings in common0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

+31.8%
BCD total return, 1 year
+64.3%
PIT total return, 1 year
0.30%
BCD expense ratio
0.55%
PIT expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BCD and PIT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding BCD PIT
Only in BCD
United States Treasury 5.20%
United States Treasury 5.20%
United States Treasury 5.19%
United States Treasury 5.18%
United States Treasury 4.95%
United States Treasury 4.94%
United States Treasury 4.93%
United States Treasury 4.93%
Only in PIT
Other 4.43%
Other 2.96%
Other 2.83%
Brent Crude Futr Dec26 0.00%
Brent Crude Futr Feb27 0.00%
Cattle Feeder Fut Nov26 0.00%
Cocoa Future Dec26 0.00%
Coffee 'C' Future Dec26 0.00%

On the same fields

BCD
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF
PIT
VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF
Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF
Issuer abrdn VanEck
What it is Tracks an index Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +31.8% +64.3%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +14.6 pts +47.1 pts
Expense ratio 0.30% 0.55%
Holdings 17 32
Net assets, BCD as of Oct 8, 2026 and PIT as of Jun 30, 2026 $445m $260m

BCD and PIT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

BCD in plain words

BCD tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +31.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year.

PIT in plain words

PIT is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +64.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.55% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BCD or PIT?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BCD returned +31.8% and PIT +64.3%.
Which is cheaper, BCD or PIT?
BCD is cheaper, by 0.25 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $25. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
BCD vs COMBBCD vs NBCMBCD vs CMDTBCD vs SDCIPIT vs SDCINBCM vs PITCMDY vs PITCMDT vs PIT
BCD on its own →PIT on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
BCD filings on SEC EDGAR ↗BCD prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗abrdn website ↗PIT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗PIT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗VanEck website ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, BCD against PIT, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bcd-vs-pit

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.