BCD vs SDCI: how they differ

BCD and SDCI hold 35% of their weight in the same names, and SDCI returned +42.0% over the year. abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF and USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund.

BCD costs 0.30 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.2 points; SDCI is 1.8 times larger.

BCDSDCI
Expense ratio0.30%0.60%
Net assets, BCD as of Oct 8, 2026 and SDCI as of Oct 9, 2026$445m$814m
Total return, 1 year+31.8%+42.0%
Holdings in common35%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

+31.8%
BCD total return, 1 year
+42.0%
SDCI total return, 1 year
0.30%
BCD expense ratio
0.60%
SDCI expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BCD and SDCI hold 35% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

half

35% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding BCD SDCI
United States Treasury 4.95% 7.99%
United States Treasury 4.93% 5.69%
United States Treasury 4.92% 6.99%
United States Treasury 5.20% 3.80%
United States Treasury 4.94% 3.79%
United States Treasury 4.42% 2.28%
United States Treasury 5.18% 2.08%
United States Treasury 4.68% 1.90%
United States Treasury 4.93% 1.90%
United States Treasury 4.41% 1.90%
United States Treasury 2.07% 1.89%
United States Treasury 4.43% 0.95%
Only in BCD
United States Treasury 5.20%
United States Treasury 5.19%
United States Treasury 4.92%
United States Treasury 4.42%
United States Treasury 2.08%
Only in SDCI
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 3.77%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 2.83%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 1.89%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 1.32%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 0.94%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 0.94%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 0.38%

On the same fields

BCD
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF
SDCI
USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund
Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF
Issuer abrdn USCF
What it is Tracks an index Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +31.8% +42.0%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +14.6 pts +24.7 pts
Expense ratio 0.30% 0.60%
Holdings 17 19
Net assets, BCD as of Oct 8, 2026 and SDCI as of Oct 9, 2026 $445m $814m

BCD and SDCI on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

BCD in plain words

BCD tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +31.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year.

SDCI in plain words

SDCI is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +42.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BCD or SDCI?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BCD returned +31.8% and SDCI +42.0%.
Which is cheaper, BCD or SDCI?
BCD is cheaper, by 0.30 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $30. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, BCD against SDCI, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bcd-vs-sdci

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.