Which returned more over the last year, BCD or COMT?

In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BCD returned +31.8% and COMT +50.7%.

Which is cheaper, BCD or COMT?

BCD is cheaper, by 0.18 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $18. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Compare their flows Ask about these two funds

BCD vs COMT: how they differ

BCD and COMT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and COMT returned +50.7% over the year. abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF and iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF.

BCD costs 0.18 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 18.9 points; COMT is 3.1 times larger.

	BCD	COMT
Expense ratio	0.30%	0.48%
Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026	$445m	$1.4bn
Total return, 1 year	+31.8%	+50.7%
Holdings in common	0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

+31.8%

BCD total return, 1 year

+50.7%

COMT total return, 1 year

0.30%

BCD expense ratio

0.48%

COMT expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BCD and COMT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

50%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding BCD COMT

Only in BCD

United States Treasury 5.20%

United States Treasury 5.19%

United States Treasury 5.18%

United States Treasury 4.95%

United States Treasury 4.94%

United States Treasury 4.93%

Only in COMT

FIDELITY NATL INFO SERV 144A 1.74%

CRH AMERICA FINANCE INC 144A 1.53%

EATON CAPITAL UNLIMITED 144A 1.06%

NTT FINANCE AMERICAS INC 144A 1.05%

HELVETICA FUNDING CO LLC 144A 0.98%

GLENCOVE FUNDING LLC 144A 0.97%

NEXTERA ENERGY CAPITAL HOLDINGS IN 144A 0.97%

ENBRIDGE INC 144A 0.94%

On the same fields

BCD

abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF

COMT

iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF

Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF

Issuer abrdn iShares

What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index

Total return, 1 year +31.8% +50.7%

S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%

Gap to the S&P 500 +14.6 pts +33.5 pts

Expense ratio 0.30% 0.48%

Holdings 17 176

Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 $445m $1.4bn

BCD and COMT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

BCD in plain words

BCD tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +31.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year.

COMT in plain words

COMT tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +50.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.48% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BCD or COMT?: In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BCD returned +31.8% and COMT +50.7%.
Which is cheaper, BCD or COMT?: BCD is cheaper, by 0.18 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $18. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

BCD vs CERY BCD vs GSG BCD vs DBC BCD vs SDCI COMT vs NBCM CMDY vs COMT CMDT vs COMT COMT vs PIT

BCD on its own →COMT on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

BCD filings on SEC EDGAR ↗BCD prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗abrdn website ↗COMT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗COMT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗iShares page for COMT ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, BCD against COMT, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bcd-vs-comt

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.