ETFIQ
RankingsCompareHoldingsFlowsResearch
Ask ETFIQETF ModelsMy portfolioWeekly note
A
vs
B
Share on XDownload as PDFCompare their flowsAsk about these two funds

COMT vs NBCM: how they differ

COMT and NBCM hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and COMT returned +50.7% over the year. iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF and Neuberger Commodity Strategy ETF.

COMT costs 0.17 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.4 points; COMT is 3.3 times larger.

COMTNBCM
Expense ratio0.48%0.65%
Net assets, COMT as of Oct 8, 2026 and NBCM as of May 31, 2026$1.4bn$425m
Total return, 1 year+50.7%+43.3%
Holdings in common0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

+50.7%
COMT total return, 1 year
+43.3%
NBCM total return, 1 year
0.48%
COMT expense ratio
0.65%
NBCM expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, COMT and NBCM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding COMT NBCM
Only in COMT
FIDELITY NATL INFO SERV 144A 1.74%
CRH AMERICA FINANCE INC 144A 1.53%
EATON CAPITAL UNLIMITED 144A 1.06%
NTT FINANCE AMERICAS INC 144A 1.05%
HELVETICA FUNDING CO LLC 144A 0.98%
GLENCOVE FUNDING LLC 144A 0.97%
NEXTERA ENERGY CAPITAL HOLDINGS IN 144A 0.97%
ENBRIDGE INC 144A 0.94%
Only in NBCM
US BANK NA CINCINNATI 1.92%
MORGAN STANLEY BANK NA 1.68%
MERCK & CO INC 1.59%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 1.54%
BANK OF AMERICA CORP 1.40%
BANK OF NY MELLON CORP 1.37%
ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS OPER 1.22%
ABBOTT LABORATORIES 1.20%

On the same fields

COMT
iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF
NBCM
Neuberger Commodity Strategy ETF
Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF
Issuer iShares Neuberger Berman
What it is Tracks an index Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +50.7% +43.3%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +33.5 pts +26.1 pts
Expense ratio 0.48% 0.65%
Holdings 176 149
Net assets, COMT as of Oct 8, 2026 and NBCM as of May 31, 2026 $1.4bn $425m

COMT and NBCM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

COMT in plain words

COMT tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +50.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.48% a year.

NBCM in plain words

NBCM is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.65% a year.

Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +43.3% with distributions reinvested, against +40.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg Commodity Index.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, COMT or NBCM?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COMT returned +50.7% and NBCM +43.3%.
Which is cheaper, COMT or NBCM?
COMT is cheaper, by 0.17 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $17. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
COMT vs PITCOMT vs FAARBCD vs COMTCMDT vs COMTDBC vs NBCMFTGC vs NBCMBCI vs NBCMHGER vs NBCM
COMT on its own →NBCM on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
COMT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗COMT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗iShares page for COMT ↗NBCM filings on SEC EDGAR ↗NBCM prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Neuberger Berman website ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, COMT against NBCM, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/comt-vs-nbcm

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.