DBC vs NBCM: how they differ
DBC is a commodity futures fund and NBCM an actively managed commodity fund, and over the year DBC returned +51.0% against +43.3%. Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund and Neuberger Commodity Strategy ETF.
NBCM costs 0.20 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.7 points; DBC is 4.6 times larger.
| DBC | NBCM | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.85% | 0.65% |
| Net assets, DBC as of Oct 8, 2026 and NBCM as of May 31, 2026 | $2.0bn | $425m |
| Total return, 1 year | +51.0% | +43.3% |
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| Below its high | 14.8%, high on Jul 2, 2008 | |
On the same fields
DBC and NBCM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DBC in plain words
DBC holds commodity futures. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +51.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.85% a year. It sat 14.8% below its high of Jul 2, 2008 on Oct 9, 2026.
NBCM in plain words
NBCM is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.65% a year.
Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +43.3% with distributions reinvested, against +40.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg Commodity Index.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DBC or NBCM?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DBC returned +51.0% and NBCM +43.3%.
- Which is cheaper, DBC or NBCM?
- NBCM is cheaper, by 0.20 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $20. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, DBC against NBCM, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dbc-vs-nbcm
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). DBC against NBCM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dbc-vs-nbcm
[DBC against NBCM (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dbc-vs-nbcm)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.