Which returned more over the last year, CERY or NBCM?

In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CERY returned +45.4% and NBCM +43.3%.

Which is cheaper, CERY or NBCM?

CERY is cheaper, by 0.37 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $37. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Compare their flows Ask about these two funds

CERY vs NBCM: how they differ

CERY and NBCM hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and CERY returned +45.4% over the year. State Street SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF and Neuberger Commodity Strategy ETF.

CERY costs 0.37 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.1 points; CERY is 2.6 times larger.

	CERY	NBCM
Expense ratio	0.28%	0.65%
Net assets, CERY as of Oct 8, 2026 and NBCM as of May 31, 2026	$1.1bn	$425m
Total return, 1 year	+45.4%	+43.3%
Holdings in common	0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

+45.4%

CERY total return, 1 year

+43.3%

NBCM total return, 1 year

0.28%

CERY expense ratio

0.65%

NBCM expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CERY and NBCM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

50%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding CERY NBCM

Only in CERY

TRS USD BERYTR 5.91%

Only in NBCM

US BANK NA CINCINNATI 1.92%

MORGAN STANLEY BANK NA 1.68%

MERCK & CO INC 1.59%

JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 1.54%

BANK OF AMERICA CORP 1.40%

BANK OF NY MELLON CORP 1.37%

ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS OPER 1.22%

ABBOTT LABORATORIES 1.20%

On the same fields

CERY

State Street SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF

NBCM

Neuberger Commodity Strategy ETF

Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF

Issuer State Street Neuberger Berman

What it is Tracks an index Actively managed

Total return, 1 year +45.4% +43.3%

S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%

Gap to the S&P 500 +28.2 pts +26.1 pts

Expense ratio 0.28% 0.65%

Holdings 1 149

Net assets, CERY as of Oct 8, 2026 and NBCM as of May 31, 2026 $1.1bn $425m

CERY and NBCM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

CERY in plain words

CERY tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +45.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year.

NBCM in plain words

NBCM is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.65% a year.

Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +43.3% with distributions reinvested, against +40.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg Commodity Index.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CERY or NBCM?: In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CERY returned +45.4% and NBCM +43.3%.
Which is cheaper, CERY or NBCM?: CERY is cheaper, by 0.37 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $37. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

CERY vs PIT CERY vs CMDY CERY vs FAAR CERY vs COMB COMT vs NBCM NBCM vs SDCI CMDT vs NBCM FAAR vs NBCM

CERY on its own →NBCM on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

CERY filings on SEC EDGAR ↗CERY prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗State Street website ↗NBCM filings on SEC EDGAR ↗NBCM prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Neuberger Berman website ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, CERY against NBCM, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cery-vs-nbcm

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.