Which returned more over the last year, CERY or COMB?

In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CERY returned +45.4% and COMB +40.1%.

Which is cheaper, CERY or COMB?

COMB is cheaper, by 0.03 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $3. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Compare their flows Ask about these two funds

CERY vs COMB: how they differ

CERY and COMB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and CERY returned +45.4% over the year. State Street SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF.

COMB costs 0.03 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.3 points; CERY is 7.0 times larger.

	CERY	COMB
Expense ratio	0.28%	0.25%
Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026	$1.1bn	$161m
Total return, 1 year	+45.4%	+40.1%
Holdings in common	0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

+45.4%

CERY total return, 1 year

+40.1%

COMB total return, 1 year

0.28%

CERY expense ratio

0.25%

COMB expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CERY and COMB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

50%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding CERY COMB

Only in CERY

TRS USD BERYTR 5.91%

Only in COMB

On the same fields

CERY

State Street SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF

COMB

GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF

Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF

Issuer State Street GraniteShares

What it is Tracks an index Actively managed

Total return, 1 year +45.4% +40.1%

S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%

Gap to the S&P 500 +28.2 pts +22.9 pts

Expense ratio 0.28% 0.25%

Holdings 1 0

Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 $1.1bn $161m

CERY and COMB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

CERY in plain words

CERY tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +45.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year.

COMB in plain words

COMB is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year.

Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +40.1% with distributions reinvested, against +40.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg Commodity Total Return Index.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CERY or COMB?: In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CERY returned +45.4% and COMB +40.1%.
Which is cheaper, CERY or COMB?: COMB is cheaper, by 0.03 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $3. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

CERY vs FAAR CERY vs PIT CERY vs COMT CERY vs DBC COMB vs GSG COMB vs COMT COMB vs FAAR COMB vs SDCI

CERY on its own →COMB on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

CERY filings on SEC EDGAR ↗CERY prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗State Street website ↗COMB filings on SEC EDGAR ↗COMB prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗GraniteShares page for COMB ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, CERY against COMB, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cery-vs-comb

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.