Which returned more over the last year, CERY or FTGC?

In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CERY returned +45.4% and FTGC +42.1%.

Which is cheaper, CERY or FTGC?

CERY is cheaper, by 0.70 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $70. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Compare their flows Ask about these two funds

CERY vs FTGC: how they differ

CERY and FTGC hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and CERY returned +45.4% over the year. State Street SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF and First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund.

CERY costs 0.70 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.3 points; FTGC is 3.0 times larger.

	CERY	FTGC
Expense ratio	0.28%	0.98%
Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026	$1.1bn	$3.4bn
Total return, 1 year	+45.4%	+42.1%
Holdings in common	0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.

+45.4%

CERY total return, 1 year

+42.1%

FTGC total return, 1 year

0.28%

CERY expense ratio

0.98%

FTGC expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CERY and FTGC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.

50%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding CERY FTGC

Only in CERY

TRS USD BERYTR 5.91%

Only in FTGC

GASOLINE RBOB FUT Dec26 7.38%

BRENT CRUDE FUTR Jan27 6.53%

GOLD 100 OZ FUTR Dec26 6.28%

WTI CRUDE FUTURE Dec26 5.63%

LME ZINC FUTURE Dec26 5.47%

NATURAL GAS FUTR Dec26 5.13%

Low Su Gasoil G Nov26 5.10%

COPPER FUTURE Dec26 5.05%

On the same fields

CERY

State Street SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF

FTGC

First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund

Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF

Issuer State Street First Trust

What it is Tracks an index Actively managed

Total return, 1 year +45.4% +42.1%

S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%

Gap to the S&P 500 +28.2 pts +24.9 pts

Expense ratio 0.28% 0.98%

Holdings 1 30

Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 $1.1bn $3.4bn

CERY and FTGC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

CERY in plain words

CERY tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +45.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year.

FTGC in plain words

FTGC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +42.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.98% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CERY or FTGC?: In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CERY returned +45.4% and FTGC +42.1%.
Which is cheaper, CERY or FTGC?: CERY is cheaper, by 0.70 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $70. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

CERY vs HGER CERY vs DBC CERY vs PDBC CERY vs CMDT FTGC vs GSG COMT vs FTGC FAAR vs FTGC COMB vs FTGC

CERY on its own →FTGC on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

CERY filings on SEC EDGAR ↗CERY prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗State Street website ↗FTGC filings on SEC EDGAR ↗FTGC prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗First Trust page for FTGC ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, CERY against FTGC, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cery-vs-ftgc

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.